Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Martin Van Der Meerschen vs Theo PapamalamisPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Martin Van Der Meerschen and Theo Papamalamis have met 1 time since 2026; Martin Van Der Meerschen leads 1–0. 1 of their meetings has been a final, with Meerschen leading those 1–0. Across all meetings Meerschen has taken 2 sets to Papamalamis's 1. Their most recent meeting: Martin Van Der Meerschen won at M15 Eupen (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorVan Der MeerschenPapamalamis
Wins in straight sets67%75%
Wins a set when losing29%46%
Goes to a deciding set31%31%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite54%58%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog55%100%
Tiebreak sets won56%60%
Wins after taking set 193%86%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 179%69%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Van Der Meerschen 0, Papamalamis 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Meerschen

⚔️ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Papamalamis

⚔️ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

Both Martin Van Der Meerschen and Theo Papamalamis are ⚔️ The Gladiator types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 1,370 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Aug 9, 2026

M15 Eupen

C Clay · Final

46
64
762
Meerschen

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days

OutcomeMeerschenPapamalamis
1 or more87%71%
3 or more50%29%
5 or more7%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricMeerschenPapamalamis
W-L20–913–5
Avg odds1.571.43
ROI %+3.5%-3.9%
Units P/L+1.03u-0.71u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 4 shared opponents, both Meerschen and Papamalamis posted a 75% win rate.

OpponentMeerschenPapamalamis
Louis-Lou Langenaken
W
63
62
W
60
76
Arthur Nagel
W
75
46
76
W
46
62
62
Niklas Waldner
W
62
63
W
63
64
Kai Wehnelt
L
16
46
L
46
36

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Meerschen
LLWWWLWW
L

Gabriele Crivellaro

M25 Santa Margherita di Pula · 1st Round

26
63
647

Oct 7

L

Noah Lopez

M15 Sibenik · Semifinals

61
36
36

Oct 3

W

Mak Mikovic

M15 Sibenik · Quarterfinals

75
63

Oct 2

W

Alessandro Battiston

M15 Sibenik · 2nd Round

63
62

Oct 1

W

Gabriele Pennaforti

M15 Sibenik · 1st Round

60
647
75

Sep 29

L

Florent Lagarrigue

M15 Tsaghkadzor · Quarterfinals

637
36

Sep 18

W

Matteo Vavassori

M15 Tsaghkadzor · 2nd Round

46
64
63

Sep 17

W

Radimir Lutkovskii

M15 Tsaghkadzor · 1st Round

63
62

Sep 16

Papamalamis
LWWWWLWL
L

Dominick Mosejczuk

M15 Fayetteville · Final

36
36

Oct 4

W

Alexander Rozin

M15 Fayetteville · Semifinals

63
62

Oct 3

W

Aryan Shah

M15 Fayetteville · Quarterfinals

61
36
75

Oct 2

W

Tito Chavez

M15 Fayetteville · 2nd Round

75
62

Oct 1

W

Ben Weintraub

M15 Fayetteville · 1st Round

63
62

Sep 30

L

Gerard Campana Lee

Sion Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

75
57
26

Aug 17

W

Nicolas Parizzia

Sion Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

764
16
765

Aug 16

L

Martin Van Der Meerschen

M15 Eupen · Final

64
46
627

Aug 9

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 45–54 matches

MetricMeerschenPapamalamis
Matches won61%71%
Sets won58%67%
Games won52%57%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageMeerschenPapamalamis
Finals10
ITF M1510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceMeerschenPapamalamis
Clay10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Martin Van Der Meerschen vs Theo Papamalamis FAQ

Martin Van Der Meerschen leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.