Marko Topo vs Tobias KamkePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Marko Topo and Tobias Kamke have met 1 time since 2022; Marko Topo leads 1–0. Across all meetings Topo has taken 2 sets to Kamke's 0. Their most recent meeting: Marko Topo won at Luedenscheid Challenger (2022).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Topo | Kamke | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Marko Topo | Tobias Kamke | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 69% | 18/26 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 38% | 10/26 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 35% | 18/52 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 37% | 11/30 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 62% | 13/21 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 67% | 14/21 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 22/28 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 64% | 18/28 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Topo 1, Kamke 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Topo
💥 Big Hitter
Kamke
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,249 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 28, 2022
Luedenscheid Challenger
C Clay · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Topo | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–8 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.60 | - |
| ROI % | -15.2% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.89u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Topo | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 2 | — |
| Distance | 0 mi · 0 km | — |
| Route | POR | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Dominic Stricker
Villena Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Niels Visker
Villena Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 4
Petr Nesterov
Porto Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
Porto Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 27
Kristijan Juhas
M25 Zlatibor · Final
Sep 20
Stefan Popovic
M25 Zlatibor · Quarterfinals
Sep 19
Alexandre Aubriot
M25 Zlatibor · Semifinals
Sep 19
Nikita Bilozertsev
M25 Zlatibor · 2nd Round
Sep 18
Marko Topo
Luedenscheid Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 28
Tiago Cacao
Oeiras 3 Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 20
Marek Gengel
Prague 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
May 1
Evgenii Tiurnev
Prague 1 · 2nd Round Qualifying
Apr 18
Marek Gengel
Prague 1 · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 17
Ricardas Berankis
Lille Challenger · 2nd Round
Mar 24
Henri Squire
Lille Challenger · 1st Round
Mar 22
Tim Van Rijthoven
Turin Challenger · 1st Round
Mar 1
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 52–52 matches
| Metric | Topo | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 50% | - |
| Sets won | 51% | - |
| Games won | 49% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Topo | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Topo | Kamke |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.