Liam Branger vs Maxime ChazalPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Liam Branger and Maxime Chazal have met 1 time since 2026; Maxime Chazal leads 1–0. Across all meetings Branger has taken 0 sets to Chazal's 2. Their most recent meeting: Maxime Chazal won at M15 Cap d'Agde (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Branger | Chazal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Liam Branger | Maxime Chazal | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 67% | 18/27 | 80% | 39/49 |
| Wins a set when losing | 35% | 8/23 | 41% | 12/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 34% | 17/50 | 28% | 22/78 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 56% | 14/25 | 66% | 33/50 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 40% | 8/20 | 48% | 10/21 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 17% | 3/18 | 59% | 17/29 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 23/29 | 92% | 44/48 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 62% | 18/29 | 81% | 39/48 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Branger 0, Chazal 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Branger
💥 Big Hitter
Chazal
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 3,969 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Aug 28, 2026
M15 Cap d'Agde
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Branger | Chazal | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Liam Branger | Maxime Chazal | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 16/16 | 88% | 22/25 |
| 3 or more | 56% | 9/16 | 44% | 11/25 |
| 5 or more | 25% | 4/16 | 12% | 3/25 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/16 | 0% | 0/25 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/16 | 0% | 0/25 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/16 | 0% | 0/25 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Branger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | 14–10 |
| Avg odds | 2.38 | 1.80 |
| ROI % | -11.1% | -20.1% |
| Units P/L | -1.66u | -4.83u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Branger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | BUL |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 5 shared opponents, both Branger and Chazal posted a 40% win rate.
| Opponent | Branger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Kris Van Wyk | L 62 26 46 | L 61 46 26 |
| Kristijonas Milasauskas | W 64 75 | W 63 63 |
| Arthur Nagel | L 57 63 26 | L 36 03 |
| Maxence Rivet | W 64 36 61 | W |
| Sergio Callejon Hernando | L 62 46 36 | L |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Aziz Ouakaa
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
Oct 7
Kris Van Wyk
M15 Monastir · Quarterfinals
Oct 2
Melih Anavatan
M15 Monastir · 2nd Round
Oct 1
Rocco Piatti
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
Sep 30
Etienne Donnet
M15 Monastir · Quarterfinals
Sep 25
Peter Makk
M15 Monastir · 2nd Round
Sep 24
Kristijonas Milasauskas
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
Sep 23
Leonardo Rossi
M25 Nevers · 1st Round
Sep 16
Yanaki Milev
San Gregorio di Catania Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Mathys Picard
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
Oct 6
Kris Van Wyk
M15 Monastir · 2nd Round
Oct 1
Viktor Frydrych
M15 Monastir · 1st Round
Sep 30
Jonas Forejtek
Plovdiv 4 Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 24
Joel Schwaerzler
Plovdiv 4 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 22
Alex Barrena
Biella Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
Titouan Droguet
Cassis Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 7
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 50–78 matches
| Metric | Branger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 54% | 63% |
| Sets won | 53% | 62% |
| Games won | 53% | 54% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Branger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Branger | Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.