Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Lawrence Bataljin vs Tyler SticePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Lawrence Bataljin and Tyler Stice have met 1 time since 2025; Tyler Stice leads 1–0. Across all meetings Bataljin has taken 0 sets to Stice's 2. Their most recent meeting: Tyler Stice won at M15 Budapest 2 (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorBataljinStice
Wins in straight sets0%100%
Wins a set when losing33%20%
Goes to a deciding set36%14%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite0%100%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog25%33%
Tiebreak sets won0%25%
Wins after taking set 10%67%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 10%67%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bataljin 0, Stice 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Bataljin

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Stice

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher archetype wins about 53% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 407 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tyler Stice.

Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Sep 23, 2025

M15 Budapest 2

H Hard Β· 1st Round

26
16
Stice

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricBataljinStice
W-L0–3-
Avg odds5.45-
ROI %-100.0%-
Units P/L-3.00u-

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricBataljinStice
Countries1β€”
Events1β€”
Matches1β€”
Distanceβ€”β€”
RouteSWEβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Bataljin has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Stice's 0%).

OpponentBataljinStice
Diego Eloy Mendez Montiel
W
36
62
64
L
67
36

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Bataljin
LLLLLLLL
L

Maxence Bertimon

M15 Malmo Β· 1st Round

06
06

Aug 12

L

Raffael Gasanov

Futures 2026

63
26
810

Jul 14

L

Max Van Nunen

Futures 2026

06
63
510

Jul 5

L

Roman Glarner

Futures 2026

26
57

Jun 14

L

Victor Ryden

Futures 2026

06
16

Jun 8

L

Mathys Erhard

Brazzaville Challenger Β· 1st Round

16
26

May 5

L

Dmitrii Shirokii

M15 Islamabad Β· Round of 32

64
26
69711

Apr 29

L

Dmytro Shirokyi

M15 Islamabad Β· 1st Round

64
26
697

Apr 28

Stice
LLLLLWWL
L

Nemanja Malesevic

M25 Nottingham Β· 1st Round

64
657
26

May 6

L

Petr Nesterov

M15 Manama 1 Β· 1st Round

46
26

Nov 4

L

Fitriadi M Rifqi

M15 Hua Hin 2 Β· 2nd Round

637
36

Oct 30

L

Thanapet Chanta

M15 Hua Hin 1 Β· 1st Round

57
16

Oct 21

L

Nikita Bilozertsev

M15 Budapest 2 Β· Quarterfinals

64
26
36

Sep 26

W

Attila Boros

M15 Budapest 2 Β· 2nd Round

63
767

Sep 25

W

Lawrence Bataljin

M15 Budapest 2 Β· 1st Round

62
61

Sep 23

L

James Story

M25 Nevers 1 Β· 1st Round

647
617

Sep 16

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 7–25 matches

MetricBataljinStice
Matches won4%29%
Sets won17%33%
Games won34%46%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageBataljinStice
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceBataljinStice
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Lawrence Bataljin vs Tyler Stice FAQ

Tyler Stice leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.