Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Laura Brunkel vs Mia HorvitPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Laura Brunkel and Mia Horvit have met 1 time since 2026; Mia Horvit leads 1–0. Across all meetings Brunkel has taken 0 sets to Horvit's 2. Their most recent meeting: Mia Horvit won at W15 Krsko (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorBrunkelHorvit
Wins in straight sets75%79%
Wins a set when losing0%21%
Goes to a deciding set9%21%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite33%59%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog25%29%
Tiebreak sets won0%40%
Wins after taking set 1100%96%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 175%82%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Brunkel 0, Horvit 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Brunkel

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Horvit

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

The βš”οΈ The Gladiator archetype wins about 66% vs βš™οΈ Grinder across 1,675 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Mia Horvit.

The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 15, 2026

W15 Krsko

C Clay Β· 1st Round

06
16
Horvit

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricBrunkelHorvit
W-L-4–5
Avg odds-2.92
ROI %--17.0%
Units P/L--1.53u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricBrunkelHorvit
Countriesβ€”2
Eventsβ€”2
Matchesβ€”3
Distanceβ€”β€”
Routeβ€”GER β†’ BIH

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Brunkel and Horvit posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentBrunkelHorvit
Miruna Scarlat
W
61
60
W
63
62

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Brunkel
LWWLLLLL
L

Mia Horvit

W15 Krsko Β· 1st Round

06
16

Jul 15

W

Livia Keller

W15 Krsko Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

62
63

Jul 14

W

Vanesa Mrazova

W15 Krsko Β· 1st Round Qualifying

60
61

Jul 13

L

Anna Mihalka

W15 Mogyorod Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

46
16

Jun 29

L

Anna Mihalka

Mogyorod ITF

46
16

Jun 29

L

Chiara Fornasieri

W15 Galati Β· 1st Round

26
16

Jun 24

L

Ilinca Sagmar

Bucharest 4 ITF Β· Round of 32

16
57

Jun 17

L

Ilinca Sagmar

W15 Bucharest Β· 1st Round

16
57

Jun 17

Horvit
LWLLWWWW
L

Martina Colmegna

W35 Santa Margherita di Pula Β· 2nd Round

57
57

Sep 25

W

Viola Turini

W35 Santa Margherita di Pula Β· 1st Round

57
64
64

Sep 23

L

Alisa Oktiabreva

W35 Santa Margherita di Pula Β· 1st Round

16
36

Sep 16

L

Charlotte Van Zonneveld

W15 Haren Β· Final

36
26

Sep 6

W

Rikke De Koning

W15 Haren Β· Semifinals

60
61

Sep 5

W

Joy De Zeeuw

W15 Haren Β· Quarterfinals

63
63

Sep 5

W

Vicky Van De Peer

W15 Haren Β· 2nd Round

64
60

Sep 3

W

Odeta Panasa

W15 Haren Β· 1st Round

61
61

Sep 2

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 11–48 matches

MetricBrunkelHorvit
Matches won36%60%
Sets won35%58%
Games won45%53%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageBrunkelHorvit
ITF W1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceBrunkelHorvit
Clay01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Laura Brunkel vs Mia Horvit FAQ

Mia Horvit leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.