Lan Mi vs Mandegar FarzamiPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Lan Mi and Mandegar Farzami have met 3 times since 2026; Lan Mi leads 3–0. Their first meeting came at W15 Kayseri in 2026 on hard. On hard courts Mi leads 3–0. Mi has won the last 3 meetings. Across all meetings Mi has taken 6 sets to Farzami's 1. Their most recent meeting: Lan Mi won at W15 Kayseri (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Mi | Farzami | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Lan Mi | Mandegar Farzami | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 88% | 52/59 | 92% | 12/13 |
| Wins a set when losing | 25% | 8/32 | 9% | 1/11 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 16% | 15/91 | 8% | 2/24 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 69% | 41/59 | 100% | 9/9 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 52% | 12/23 | 25% | 3/12 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 58% | 7/12 | 60% | 3/5 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 95% | 56/59 | 93% | 13/14 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 88% | 52/59 | 86% | 12/14 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mi 2, Farzami 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mi
⚔️ The Gladiator
Farzami
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
Both Lan Mi and Mandegar Farzami are ⚔️ The Gladiator types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 4,574 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.
Previous meetings
3 career meetings, newest first
Jun 25, 2026
W15 Kayseri
H Hard · 2nd Round
Jun 17, 2026
W15 Kayseri
H Hard · 1st Round
Jun 13, 2026
W15 Kayseri
H Hard · Semifinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Mi | Farzami | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Lan Mi | Mandegar Farzami | ||
| 1 or more | 4% | 1/24 | 0% | 0/10 |
| 3 or more | 0% | 0/24 | 0% | 0/10 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/24 | 0% | 0/10 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/24 | 0% | 0/10 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/24 | 0% | 0/10 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/24 | 0% | 0/10 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mi | Farzami |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16–7 | 5–4 |
| Avg odds | 1.64 | 3.11 |
| ROI % | -7.3% | -25.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.69u | -2.25u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Mi | Farzami |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 3 | — |
| Matches | 10 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | TUN → SRB | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Mi has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Farzami's 33%).
| Opponent | Mi | Farzami |
|---|---|---|
| Duru Soke | L 46 36 | L 26 46 |
| Ayline Esina Samardzic | W 61 62 | W 76 61 |
| Irem Kurt | W 60 62 | L 16 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
W35 Barueri · Semifinals
Aug 29
Carolina Alves
W35 Barueri · Quarterfinals
Aug 28
Isabella Barrera Aguirre
W35 Barueri · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Alisa Danilova
W35 Barueri · 1st Round
Aug 26
Victoria Luiza Barros
W15 Campos do Jordao · 2nd Round
Aug 20
Catarina Melleiro
W15 Campos do Jordao · 1st Round
Aug 19
Luiza Fullana
W15 Campos do Jordao · Final
Aug 16
Marjorie Souza
W15 Campos do Jordao · Semifinals
Aug 15
Duru Soke
W15 Kayseri · Semifinals
Jul 4
Alfrista Sari
Kayseri 7 ITF · Round of 16
Jul 2
Serife Pelin Sari
W15 Kayseri · 2nd Round
Jul 2
Minel Naz Kaynak
W15 Kayseri · 1st Round
Jul 1
Lan Mi
W15 Kayseri · 2nd Round
Jun 25
Nahjime Dho
W15 Kayseri · 1st Round
Jun 23
Lan Mi
W15 Kayseri · 1st Round
Jun 17
Lan Mi
W15 Kayseri · Semifinals
Jun 13
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 24–91 matches
| Metric | Mi | Farzami |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 65% | 54% |
| Sets won | 64% | 54% |
| Games won | 55% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Mi | Farzami |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W15 | 3 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Mi | Farzami |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 3 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.