Kyle Kang vs Tyler ZinkPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Kyle Kang and Tyler Zink have met 1 time since 2025; Kyle Kang leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kang has taken 2 sets to Zink's 0. Their most recent meeting: Kyle Kang won at M25 Edwardsville 1 (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kang | Zink | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Kyle Kang | Tyler Zink | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 62% | 18/29 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/1 | 27% | 9/33 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/1 | 32% | 20/62 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 42% | 11/26 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/1 | 47% | 15/32 |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 45% | 10/22 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 83% | 25/30 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 60% | 18/30 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kang 1, Zink 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kang
⚔️ The Gladiator
Zink
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 56% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 1,159 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tyler Zink.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Aug 1, 2025
M25 Edwardsville 1
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kang | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 4–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.30 |
| ROI % | - | -43.7% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.81u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kang | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 3 |
| Matches | — | 4 |
| Distance | — | 1,617 mi · 2,602 km |
| Route | — | USA → JAM |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Sanhui Shin
M15 Gimcheon 2 · 1st Round
Nov 26
Hady Habib
Chicago Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 5
Aidan McHugh
M25 Edwardsville 1 · Final
Aug 3
Aidan Kim
M25 Edwardsville 1 · Semifinals
Aug 2
Tyler Zink
M25 Edwardsville 1 · Quarterfinals
Aug 1
Nathan Ponwith
M25 Edwardsville 1 · 2nd Round
Jul 31
Victor Lilov
M25 Edwardsville IL · Round of 32
Jul 30
Paul Jubb
M25 Champaign 1 · Quarterfinals
Jul 25
Luis Felipe Miguel
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 24
Valentin Royer
Kingston 1 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Lucas Andrade Da Silva
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Gauthier Onclin
Brownsburg Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 11
J.J. Wolf
Vancouver Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
James Kent Trotter
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Zhizhen Zhang
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 21
Alexis Galarneau
Granby Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–62 matches
| Metric | Kang | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 47% |
| Sets won | 0% | 47% |
| Games won | 29% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kang | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kang | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.