Kyle Edmund vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
π¬π§Kyle Edmund
Unranked
66w1 meeting Β· sets 2β0

πΊπΈStrong Kirchheimer
#717 Β· 31 yrs Β· R
9wKyle Edmund and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2024; Kyle Edmund leads 1β0. Across all meetings Edmund has taken 2 sets to Kirchheimer's 0. Their most recent meeting: Kyle Edmund won at Charlottesville (2024).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Edmund | Kirchheimer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Kyle Edmund | Strong Kirchheimer | ||
| Wins in straight sets | β | 56% | 15/27 | |
| Wins a set when losing | β | 31% | 9/29 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | β | 38% | 21/56 | |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | β | 47% | 9/19 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | β | 48% | 13/27 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | β | 38% | 10/26 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | β | 80% | 20/25 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | β | 60% | 15/25 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Edmund 1, Kirchheimer 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Edmund
π The Complete Package
Kirchheimer
πΎ All-Court
Matchup analysis
The π The Complete Package archetype wins about 55% vs πΎ All-Court across 281 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Kyle Edmund.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 28, 2024
Charlottesville
H Hard Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0β2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.86 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Jack Pinnington Jones
Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· Final
Jul 13
Hamish Stewart
Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· Semifinals
Jul 12
Liam Broady
Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jul 10
Tom Hands
Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Zachary Svajda
Ilkley Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 9
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Ilkley Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 8
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Birmingham Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 1
Blaz Rola
Knoxville Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 3
Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo
M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round
Aug 12
Tyler Zink
Lexington Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 2
Enzo Aguiard
Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 19
Philip Sekulic
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jul 14
Edward Winter
Granby Challenger Β· 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Kody Pearson
Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
M25 Laval Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Tristan Stringer
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 56β56 matches
| Metric | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 48% |
| Sets won | - | 47% |
| Games won | - | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Edmund | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.