Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Kyle Edmund vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Kyle Edmund and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2024; Kyle Edmund leads 1–0. Across all meetings Edmund has taken 2 sets to Kirchheimer's 0. Their most recent meeting: Kyle Edmund won at Charlottesville (2024).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorEdmundKirchheimer
Wins in straight setsβ€”56%
Wins a set when losingβ€”31%
Goes to a deciding setβ€”38%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteβ€”47%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogβ€”48%
Tiebreak sets wonβ€”38%
Wins after taking set 1β€”80%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1β€”60%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Edmund 1, Kirchheimer 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Edmund

πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Kirchheimer

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game

Matchup analysis

The πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 281 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Kyle Edmund.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Oct 28, 2024

Charlottesville

H Hard Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

64
62
Edmund

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricEdmundKirchheimer
W-L-0–2
Avg odds-2.86
ROI %--100.0%
Units P/L--2.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Edmund
LLLLLWLL
L

Jack Pinnington Jones

Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· Final

46
617

Jul 13

L

Hamish Stewart

Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· Semifinals

61
64

Jul 12

L

Liam Broady

Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· 2nd Round

761
62

Jul 10

L

Tom Hands

Nottingham 3 Challenger Β· 1st Round

64
64

Jul 8

L

Zachary Svajda

Ilkley Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

36
36

Jun 9

W

Yasutaka Uchiyama

Ilkley Β· 1st Round Qualifying

62
62

Jun 8

L

Yasutaka Uchiyama

Birmingham Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
26

Jun 1

L

Blaz Rola

Knoxville Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
6477

Nov 3

Kirchheimer
LLLLWWLW
L

Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo

M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round

Aug 12

L

Tyler Zink

Lexington Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

627
46

Aug 2

L

Enzo Aguiard

Winnipeg Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

63
617
26

Jul 19

L

Philip Sekulic

Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
06

Jul 14

W

Edward Winter

Granby Challenger Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

63
762

Jul 13

W

Kody Pearson

Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

64
61

Jul 12

L

Jay Dylan Hara Friend

M25 Laval Β· Quarterfinals

627
63
46

Jul 10

W

Tristan Stringer

Futures 2026

36
61
764

Jul 10

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 56–56 matches

MetricEdmundKirchheimer
Matches won-48%
Sets won-47%
Games won-50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageEdmundKirchheimer
ATP Challenger Tour10

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceEdmundKirchheimer
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Kyle Edmund vs Strong Kirchheimer FAQ

Kyle Edmund leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.