Kristjan Tamm vs Naoya HondaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Kristjan Tamm and Naoya Honda have met 1 time since 2026; Kristjan Tamm leads 1–0. Across all meetings Tamm has taken 2 sets to Honda's 0. Their most recent meeting: Kristjan Tamm won at Wuning 3 Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Tamm | Honda | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Kristjan Tamm | Naoya Honda | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 64% | 9/14 | 82% | 28/34 |
| Wins a set when losing | 27% | 4/15 | 37% | 10/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 31% | 9/29 | 26% | 16/61 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 42% | 5/12 | 48% | 16/33 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 43% | 6/14 | 42% | 8/19 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 67% | 8/12 | 58% | 15/26 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 11/14 | 78% | 32/41 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 64% | 9/14 | 68% | 28/41 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Tamm 1, Honda 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Tamm
🤖 Servebot
Honda
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🤖 Servebot vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 4,932 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 4, 2026
Wuning 3 Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Tamm | Honda | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Kristjan Tamm | Naoya Honda | ||
| 1 or more | 93% | 13/14 | 94% | 17/18 |
| 3 or more | 79% | 11/14 | 56% | 10/18 |
| 5 or more | 64% | 9/14 | 39% | 7/18 |
| 10 or more | 21% | 3/14 | 6% | 1/18 |
| 15 or more | 7% | 1/14 | 0% | 0/18 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/14 | 0% | 0/18 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Tamm | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | 8–9 |
| Avg odds | 2.98 | 2.24 |
| ROI % | +10.6% | -4.4% |
| Units P/L | +1.59u | -0.74u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Tamm | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 3 |
| Distance | — | 542 mi · 872 km |
| Route | — | CHN |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Honda has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Tamm's 33%).
| Opponent | Tamm | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Player | W 61 63 | W 61 62 |
| Amit Vales | L 46 26 | W 63 62 |
| Taisei Ichikawa | L 67 36 | W 61 26 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Unknown Player
M25 Qian Daohu · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Martin Borisiouk
Wuning 3 Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Naoya Honda
Wuning 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 4
Dong Ju Kim
Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 6
Yuta Tomida
M15 Wuning · Quarterfinals
Sep 4
Zaharije-Zak Talic
M15 Wuning · 2nd Round
Sep 3
Reiya Komagata
M15 Wuning · 1st Round
Sep 2
Matthew Dellavedova
M25 Taipei · Quarterfinals
Aug 28
Kristjan Tamm
Wuning 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 4
Marat Sharipov
Jingshan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Petr Bar Biryukov
Guangzhou Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 17
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 16
Jesse Flores
Guangzhou Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Duan Hao
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 13
Ryota Tanuma
M25 Sapporo · 1st Round
Sep 9
Naoki Nakagawa
M25 Urayasu · 2nd Round
Sep 3
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 30–61 matches
| Metric | Tamm | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 50% | 56% |
| Sets won | 49% | 57% |
| Games won | 49% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Tamm | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Tamm | Honda |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.