Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Khumoyun Sultanov vs Oleg PrihodkoPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Khumoyun Sultanov and Oleg Prihodko have met 1 time since 2026; Khumoyun Sultanov leads 1–0. Across all meetings Sultanov has taken 2 sets to Prihodko's 0. Their most recent meeting: Khumoyun Sultanov won at M25 Zagreb (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorSultanovPrihodko
Wins in straight sets93%67%
Wins a set when losing42%25%
Goes to a deciding set17%30%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite68%47%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog33%47%
Tiebreak sets won75%63%
Wins after taking set 190%93%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 187%69%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sultanov 1, Prihodko 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Sultanov

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Prihodko

πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer

Matchup analysis

The πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 53% vs πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher across 1,744 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Oleg Prihodko.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jun 27, 2026

M25 Zagreb

C Clay Β· Semifinals

63
61
Sultanov

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricSultanovPrihodko
W-L-10–8
Avg odds-1.65
ROI %--19.7%
Units P/L--3.55u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricSultanovPrihodko
Countriesβ€”1
Eventsβ€”1
Matchesβ€”1
Distanceβ€”0 mi Β· 0 km
Routeβ€”BUL

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Prihodko has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Sultanov's 0%).

OpponentSultanovPrihodko
Karl Friberg
L
63
46
26
W
63
57
60

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Sultanov
LLWWWWWW
L

Karl Friberg

M25 The Hague Β· 1st Round

63
46
26

Jul 7

L

Filip Jeff Planinsek

M25 Marburg Β· Quarterfinals

57
62
26

Jul 3

W

Paul Jubb

M25 Marburg Β· 2nd Round

62
61

Jul 2

W

Jim Hendrikx

M25 Marburg Β· 1st Round

60
60

Jul 1

W

Kalin Ivanovski

M25 Zagreb Β· Final

64
64

Jun 28

W

Oleg Prihodko

M25 Zagreb Β· Semifinals

63
61

Jun 27

W

Sebastian Sorger

M25 Zagreb Β· Quarterfinals

75
64

Jun 26

W

Antonio Voljavec

M25 Zagreb Β· 2nd Round

62
62

Jun 25

Prihodko
LLWLLWWW
L

Patrick Brady

Roanne Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

16
26

Oct 11

L

Axel Garcian

M15 Rodez Β· 2nd Round

26
26

Oct 8

W

Karl Friberg

M15 Rodez Β· 1st Round

63
57
60

Oct 7

L

Adrian Andreev

Plovdiv 4 Challenger Β· 1st Round

16
46

Sep 22

L

Kristijan Juhas

M25 Zlatibor Β· Semifinals

57
637

Sep 19

W

Adrian Andreev

M25 Zlatibor Β· Quarterfinals

61
61

Sep 18

W

Drazen Petrovic

M25 Zlatibor Β· 2nd Round

63
60

Sep 18

W

Veljko Krstic

M25 Zlatibor Β· 1st Round

62
61

Sep 17

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 41–55 matches

MetricSultanovPrihodko
Matches won71%55%
Sets won71%53%
Games won58%52%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageSultanovPrihodko
ITF M2510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceSultanovPrihodko
Clay10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Khumoyun Sultanov vs Oleg Prihodko FAQ

Khumoyun Sultanov leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.