Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Kayla Day vs Louisa ChiricoPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Kayla Day and Louisa Chirico have met 1 time since 2026; Kayla Day leads 1–0. Across all meetings Day has taken 2 sets to Chirico's 0. Their most recent meeting: Kayla Day won at W50 Orlando 1 (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorDayChirico
Wins in straight sets74%75%
Wins a set when losing40%40%
Goes to a deciding set30%33%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite57%56%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog54%44%
Tiebreak sets won65%50%
Wins after taking set 189%80%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 174%60%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Day 1, Chirico 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Day

πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Chirico

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher across 6,005 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Kayla Day.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Feb 5, 2026

W50 Orlando 1

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

63
61
Day

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricDayChirico
W-L5–6-
Avg odds2.98-
ROI %-25.0%-
Units P/L-2.75u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricDayChirico
Countries2β€”
Events2β€”
Matches3β€”
Distance411 mi Β· 662 kmβ€”
RouteCAN β†’ POLβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Day has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Chirico's 0%).

OpponentDayChirico
Mary Stoiana
L
57
46
L
67
36
Fiona Crawley
L
16
26
L
46
63
46
Malaika Rapolu
W
61
46
75
L
57
26
Emina Bektas
W
64
36
64
L
16
75
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Day
LLWLLWWW
L

Shuai Zhang

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati Β· 1st Round

62
26
26

Aug 15

L

Coco Gauff

National Bank Open - Toronto Β· 2nd Round

26
57

Aug 5

W

Diane Parry

National Bank Open - Toronto Β· 1st Round

36
63
75

Aug 3

L

Mai Hontama

Odlum Brown VanOpen - Vancouver Β· 1st Round

763
36
46

Jul 28

L

Madison Keys

Wimbledon - London Β· 1st Round

765
46
36

Jun 30

W

Katarzyna Kawa

Wimbledon

62
75

Jun 25

W

Erika Andreeva

Wimbledon

62
62

Jun 24

W

Cadence Brace

Wimbledon

64
63

Jun 23

Chirico
LLWLWWLW
L

Hanyu Guo

Dow Tennis Classic - Midland Β· 1st Round

63
46
26

Feb 17

L

Kayla Day

W50 Orlando 1 Β· 2nd Round

36
16

Feb 5

W

Carolina Alves

W50 Orlando 1 Β· 1st Round

75
63

Feb 3

L

Elvina Kalieva

W100 San Diego 1 Β· Quarterfinals

677
36

Jan 30

W

Ella Mcdonald

W100 San Diego 1 Β· 2nd Round

64
46
64

Jan 29

W

Anastasia Abbagnato

W100 San Diego 1 Β· 1st Round

64
764

Jan 27

L

Varvara Lepchenko

Austin 125 - Austin Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Nov 5

W

Petra Marcinko

Austin 125 - Austin Β· 1st Round

64
64

Nov 3

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 18–66 matches

MetricDayChirico
Matches won70%44%
Sets won66%48%
Games won56%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageDayChirico
ITF W5010

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceDayChirico
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Kayla Day vs Louisa Chirico FAQ

Kayla Day leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.