Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Karl Poling vs Sean HodkinPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Karl Poling and Sean Hodkin have met 1 time since 2026; Sean Hodkin leads 1–0. Across all meetings Poling has taken 0 sets to Hodkin's 2. Their most recent meeting: Sean Hodkin won at M25 Nottingham (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorPolingHodkin
Wins in straight sets56%67%
Wins a set when losing35%40%
Goes to a deciding set40%38%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite42%100%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog61%45%
Tiebreak sets won43%25%
Wins after taking set 184%50%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 161%50%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Poling 0, Hodkin 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Poling

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Hodkin

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

The πŸ’₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 58% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 311 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Sean Hodkin.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

May 5, 2026

M25 Nottingham

H Hard Β· 1st Round

16
06
Hodkin

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricPolingHodkin
W-L14–50–1
Avg odds2.352.41
ROI %+71.0%-100.0%
Units P/L+13.50u-1.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricPolingHodkin
Countries2β€”
Events2β€”
Matches6β€”
Distanceβ€”β€”
RouteUSA β†’ JAMβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Hodkin has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Poling's 0%).

OpponentPolingHodkin
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
L
57
46
W
63
60

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Poling
LWWWWWLW
L

Thomas Fancutt

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
36

Aug 25

W

Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes

M25 East Lansing Β· Final

57
765
64

Aug 16

W

Nikita Filin

M25 East Lansing Β· Semifinals

64
46
764

Aug 15

W

Axel Nefve

M25 East Lansing Β· Quarterfinals

761
64

Aug 14

W

Thomas Fancutt

M25 East Lansing Β· 2nd Round

36
767
61

Aug 13

W

Jesse Flores

M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round

64
64

Aug 12

L

Kenta Miyoshi

Granby challenger

657
75
57

Jul 13

W

Matt Kuhar

Granby challenger

46
63
63

Jul 12

Hodkin
LLLLWLLL
L

Toby Martin

M25 Aldershot Β· 1st Round

36
46

Jul 28

L

Hamish Stewart

Lexus Birmingham Open Β· 1st Round Qualifying

36
16

May 31

L

Conor Gannon

M25 Nottingham Β· 2nd Round

36
57

May 7

L

Conor Gannon

M25 Nottingham Β· Round of 16

36
57

May 7

W

Karl Poling

M25 Nottingham Β· 1st Round

61
60

May 5

L

Braden Shick

M25 Nottingham Β· 1st Round

26
46

Apr 29

L

Tiago Cacao

M25 Vale do Lobo 1 Β· 1st Round

64
36
627

Feb 25

L

Dominik Kellovsky

M25 Sheffield 1 Β· 1st Round

637
62
57

Feb 3

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 13–65 matches

MetricPolingHodkin
Matches won52%23%
Sets won51%32%
Games won50%46%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StagePolingHodkin
ITF M2501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfacePolingHodkin
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Karl Poling vs Sean Hodkin FAQ

Sean Hodkin leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.