Justin Roberts vs Nathan CoxPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Justin Roberts and Nathan Cox have met 1 time since 2026; Justin Roberts leads 1–0. Across all meetings Roberts has taken 2 sets to Cox's 1. Their most recent meeting: Justin Roberts won at M15 Lakewood (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Roberts | Cox | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Justin Roberts | Nathan Cox | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 38% | 5/13 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Wins a set when losing | 29% | 5/17 | 50% | 3/6 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 43% | 13/30 | 60% | 6/10 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 33% | 3/9 | 50% | 1/2 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 39% | 7/18 | 63% | 5/8 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 60% | 9/15 | 0% | 0/4 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 10/12 | 100% | 1/1 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 42% | 5/12 | 100% | 1/1 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Roberts 0, Cox 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Roberts
⚙️ Grinder
Cox
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
Both Justin Roberts and Nathan Cox are ⚙️ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 654 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 3, 2026
M15 Lakewood
H Hard · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Roberts | Cox | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Justin Roberts | Nathan Cox | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 7/7 | 88% | 7/8 |
| 3 or more | 57% | 4/7 | 25% | 2/8 |
| 5 or more | 29% | 2/7 | 13% | 1/8 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/8 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Roberts | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–5 | 3–5 |
| Avg odds | 3.22 | 2.74 |
| ROI % | -23.9% | -48.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.91u | -3.87u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Roberts | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 1 | 1 |
| Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | USA | PAR |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Jelani Sarr
M25 East Lansing · 1st Round
Aug 12
Vignesh Gogineni
M25 Edwardsville · 1st Round
Jul 29
Maximillian Mroz
M25 Champaign · 1st Round
Jul 22
Maximillian Mroz
M25 Champaign · 1st Round
Jul 22
Edward Winter
Granby challenger
Jul 12
Timo Legout
M25 Laval · 1st Round
Jul 8
Oliver Bonding
M15 Lakewood · 2nd Round
Jun 4
Nathan Cox
M15 Lakewood · 1st Round
Jun 3
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
M15 Asuncion · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Bautista De La Pena
M15 Asuncion · 1st Round
Aug 18
Axel Nefve
M15 Rochester · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Zac Hamill
M15 Rochester · 1st Round
Jul 15
Neo Niedner
M15 Irvine · 2nd Round
Jun 18
Aadarsh Tripathi
M15 Irvine · 1st Round
Jun 17
Noah Zamora
M15 Los Angeles · 1st Round
Jun 10
Justin Roberts
M15 Lakewood · 1st Round
Jun 3
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 10–30 matches
| Metric | Roberts | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 43% | 40% |
| Sets won | 42% | 42% |
| Games won | 49% | 49% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Roberts | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Roberts | Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.