Joshua Peck vs Matthew ThomsonPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Joshua Peck and Matthew Thomson have met 1 time since 2026; Matthew Thomson leads 1–0. Across all meetings Peck has taken 0 sets to Thomson's 2. Their most recent meeting: Matthew Thomson won at M15 Huamantla (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Peck | Thomson | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Joshua Peck | Matthew Thomson | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 56% | 10/18 | 30% | 3/10 |
| Wins a set when losing | 26% | 8/31 | 27% | 3/11 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 33% | 16/49 | 48% | 10/21 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 5/10 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 40% | 12/30 | 58% | 7/12 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 45% | 5/11 | 33% | 3/9 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 69% | 11/16 | 88% | 7/8 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 63% | 10/16 | 38% | 3/8 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Peck 0, Thomson 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Peck
⚙️ Grinder
Thomson
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,211 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Matthew Thomson.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 30, 2026
M15 Huamantla
H Hard · 2nd Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Peck | Thomson | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Joshua Peck | Matthew Thomson | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 10/10 | 92% | 11/12 |
| 3 or more | 50% | 5/10 | 83% | 10/12 |
| 5 or more | 20% | 2/10 | 58% | 7/12 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 8% | 1/12 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 8% | 1/12 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 0% | 0/12 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Peck | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–8 | 9–3 |
| Avg odds | 2.39 | 2.17 |
| ROI % | -24.1% | +47.5% |
| Units P/L | -3.37u | +5.70u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Peck | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 3 | 1 |
| Matches | 6 | 1 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | USA | MEX |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Peck has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Thomson's 0%).
| Opponent | Peck | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| Axel Nefve | L 36 16 | L 46 61 16 |
| Evan Bynoe | W 64 63 | L 16 67 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Preston Stearns
M15 Champaign · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Preston Stearns
M15 Champaign · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Adam Jilly
M15 Champaign · 1st Round
Aug 26
Axel Nefve
M25 East Lansing · 2nd Round
Aug 13
Evan Bynoe
M25 East Lansing · 1st Round
Aug 12
Evan Zhu
M25 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 4
Matthew Thomson
M15 Huamantla · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Matteo Covato
M15 Huamantla · 1st Round
Jul 29
Elijah Strode
M15 Huamantla · Semifinals
Aug 1
Matt Kuhar
M15 Huamantla · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Joshua Peck
M15 Huamantla · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Lance Amaury Lage Castelan
M15 Huamantla · 1st Round
Jul 29
Alvin Nicholas Tudorica
M15 Huamantla · Final
Jul 26
Preston Brown
M15 Huamantla · Semifinals
Jul 25
Joaquin Guilleme
M15 Huamantla · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
Aditya Vishal Balsekar
M15 Huamantla · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 21–49 matches
| Metric | Peck | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 37% | 48% |
| Sets won | 39% | 44% |
| Games won | 46% | 49% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Peck | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Peck | Thomson |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.