Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jonah Braswell vs Matisse FarzamPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jonah Braswell and Matisse Farzam have met 1 time since 2026; Matisse Farzam leads 1–0. Across all meetings Braswell has taken 0 sets to Farzam's 2. Their most recent meeting: Matisse Farzam won at M25 Wichita (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorBraswellFarzam
Wins in straight sets33%83%
Wins a set when losing14%38%
Goes to a deciding set38%29%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite50%80%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog14%63%
Tiebreak sets won33%67%
Wins after taking set 1100%63%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 150%63%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Braswell 0, Farzam 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Braswell

πŸƒ Pusher

Extreme retrievalLow error rateFrustrates opponentsDefensive baseline play
vs

Farzam

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

The βš™οΈ Grinder archetype wins about 70% vs πŸƒ Pusher across 41 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Matisse Farzam.

Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jun 10, 2026

M25 Wichita

H Hard Β· 1st Round

36
46
Farzam

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeBraswellFarzam
1 or more60%83%
3 or more0%83%
5 or more0%33%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricBraswellFarzam
W-L2–63–5
Avg odds2.832.44
ROI %-62.3%-40.6%
Units P/L-4.98u-3.25u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricBraswellFarzam
Countriesβ€”1
Eventsβ€”1
Matchesβ€”2
Distanceβ€”β€”
Routeβ€”USA

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Braswell
LLLWLWWL
L

Johannus Monday

M25 Edwardsville Β· 1st Round

36
26

Jul 29

L

Michael Antonius

M15 Rochester Β· 1st Round

36
36

Jul 15

L

William Manning

M25 Dallas Β· 1st Round

36
761
657

Jul 8

W

Nathan Cox

Futures 2026

46
62
119

Jul 7

L

Nicolas Arseneault

M25 Tulsa Β· 1st Round

617
46

Jun 17

W

Vladislav Melnic

Futures 2026

64
64

Jun 16

W

Alejandro Moreno

Futures 2026

57
60
105

Jun 15

L

Matisse Farzam

Futures 2026

36
46

Jun 10

Farzam
LWLWLLLL
L

Felix Corwin

M15 Champaign Β· 2nd Round

36
26

Aug 27

W

Mikael Arseneault

M15 Champaign Β· 1st Round

26
762
765

Aug 26

L

Markus Molder

M15 Dublin Β· 2nd Round

57
677

Jul 30

W

Cian Maguire

M15 Dublin Β· 1st Round

63
63

Jul 28

L

Francisco Rocha

M15 Castelo Branco Β· 1st Round

761
16
657

Jul 15

L

Hayato Matsuoka

Newport challenger

46
36

Jul 5

L

Andres Martin

M25 Tulsa Β· 1st Round

762
26
16

Jun 16

L

Kenta Miyoshi

M25 Wichita Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Jun 11

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 13–14 matches

MetricBraswellFarzam
Matches won46%43%
Sets won42%47%
Games won49%48%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageBraswellFarzam
ITF M2501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceBraswellFarzam
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jonah Braswell vs Matisse Farzam FAQ

Matisse Farzam leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.