John Hallquist Lithen vs Yannik KelmPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
John Hallquist Lithen and Yannik Kelm have met 1 time since 2026; Yannik Kelm leads 1–0. Across all meetings Lithen has taken 0 sets to Kelm's 2. Their most recent meeting: Yannik Kelm won at M25 Metzingen (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Hallquist Lithen | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | John Hallquist Lithen | Yannik Kelm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 80% | 41/51 | 89% | 47/53 |
| Wins a set when losing | 26% | 9/34 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 22% | 19/85 | 26% | 21/80 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 58% | 26/45 | 73% | 30/41 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 41% | 12/29 | 84% | 26/31 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 57% | 8/14 | 64% | 9/14 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 85% | 44/52 | 86% | 48/56 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 79% | 41/52 | 84% | 47/56 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hallquist Lithen 0, Kelm 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lithen
⚔️ The Gladiator
Kelm
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
Both John Hallquist Lithen and Yannik Kelm are ⚔️ The Gladiator types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 1,488 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 21, 2026
M25 Metzingen
C Clay · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Lithen | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | John Hallquist Lithen | Yannik Kelm | ||
| 1 or more | 39% | 10/26 | 80% | 24/30 |
| 3 or more | 8% | 2/26 | 30% | 9/30 |
| 5 or more | 4% | 1/26 | 3% | 1/30 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/26 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/26 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/26 | 0% | 0/30 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lithen | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 16–11 | 30–4 |
| Avg odds | 1.86 | 1.48 |
| ROI % | -18.7% | +31.5% |
| Units P/L | -5.04u | +10.72u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Lithen | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 4 | — |
| Events | 5 | — |
| Matches | 17 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | AUT → SVK → SWE → HUN | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kelm has a higher win rate against shared opponents (80% vs Lithen's 60%).
| Opponent | Lithen | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Trisztan Gubi | W 63 63 | W 63 61 |
| Bercel Sandor Takacs | W 62 26 61 | W 61 64 |
| Peter Makk | L 46 26 | W 63 36 63 |
| Eric Vanshelboim | L 61 16 46 | L 26 16 |
| Samir Hamza Reguig | W 63 62 | W 06 63 76 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ignacio Monzon
M15 Pecs · Semifinals
Aug 29
Trisztan Gubi
M15 Pecs · Quarterfinals
Aug 28
Bercel Sandor Takacs
M15 Pecs · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Bercel Sandor Takacs
M15 Pecs · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Peter Sallay
M15 Pecs · 1st Round
Aug 26
Leo Borg
M15 Bastad · Semifinals
Aug 22
Davide Tortora
M15 Bastad · Quarterfinals
Aug 21
Oskar Jansson
M15 Bastad · 1st Round
Aug 20
Tom Sickenberger
M25 Wetzlar · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Aaron Funk
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Deney Wassermann
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 29
Patrick Zahraj
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Johan Nikles
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
David Eichenseher
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
John Hallquist Lithen
M25 Metzingen · 1st Round
Jul 21
Louis Wessels
M25 The Hague · Semifinals
Jul 11
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 80–85 matches
| Metric | Lithen | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 60% | 66% |
| Sets won | 59% | 67% |
| Games won | 55% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Lithen | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Lithen | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.