Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

John Hallquist Lithen vs Peter SallayPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

John Hallquist Lithen and Peter Sallay have met 1 time since 2026; John Hallquist Lithen leads 1–0. Across all meetings Lithen has taken 2 sets to Sallay's 1. Their most recent meeting: John Hallquist Lithen won at M15 Pecs (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorHallquist LithenSallay
Wins in straight sets80%50%
Wins a set when losing26%11%
Goes to a deciding set22%23%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite58%β€”
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog41%20%
Tiebreak sets won57%0%
Wins after taking set 185%75%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 179%50%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hallquist Lithen 0, Sallay 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Lithen

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Sallay

πŸƒ Pusher

Extreme retrievalLow error rateFrustrates opponentsDefensive baseline play

Matchup analysis

The βš”οΈ The Gladiator archetype wins about 68% vs πŸƒ Pusher across 36 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward John Hallquist Lithen.

The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Aug 26, 2026

M15 Pecs

C Clay Β· 1st Round

26
60
63
Lithen

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricLithenSallay
W-L16–110–2
Avg odds1.866.57
ROI %-18.7%-100.0%
Units P/L-5.04u-2.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricLithenSallay
Countries42
Events52
Matches172
Distanceβ€”β€”
RouteAUT β†’ SVK β†’ SWE β†’ HUNSVK β†’ HUN

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Lithen
LWWWWLWW
L

Ignacio Monzon

M15 Pecs Β· Semifinals

57
63
16

Aug 29

W

Trisztan Gubi

M15 Pecs Β· Quarterfinals

63
63

Aug 28

W

Bercel Sandor Takacs

M15 Pecs Β· 2nd Round

62
26
61

Aug 27

W

Bercel Sandor Takacs

M15 Pecs Β· 2nd Round

62
26
61

Aug 27

W

Peter Sallay

M15 Pecs Β· 1st Round

26
60
63

Aug 26

L

Leo Borg

M15 Bastad Β· Semifinals

36
57

Aug 22

W

Davide Tortora

M15 Bastad Β· Quarterfinals

61
62

Aug 21

W

Oskar Jansson

M15 Bastad Β· 1st Round

60
62

Aug 20

Sallay
LLLLWWLL
L

John Hallquist Lithen

M15 Pecs Β· 1st Round

62
06
36

Aug 26

L

Matthias Ujvary

M15 Poprad Β· 1st Round

26
36

Aug 5

L

Gabor Hornung

Futures 2026

26
26

Jun 15

L

Baltazar Wiger Nordas

Futures 2026

46
647

Jun 8

W

Peter Nad

Futures 2026

62
36
105

Jun 7

W

Lucas Hammond

Futures 2026

16
62
119

May 31

L

Anton Shepp

M15 Monastir Β· 1st Round

26
46

Apr 8

L

Liam Broady

M15 Budapest 2 Β· 1st Round

16
26

Sep 24

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 13–85 matches

MetricLithenSallay
Matches won60%31%
Sets won59%31%
Games won55%44%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageLithenSallay
ITF M1510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceLithenSallay
Clay10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

John Hallquist Lithen vs Peter Sallay FAQ

John Hallquist Lithen leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.