Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

John Hallquist Lithen vs Oskar JanssonPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

John Hallquist Lithen and Oskar Jansson have met 2 times since 2026; John Hallquist Lithen leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at M15 Malmo in 2026 on clay. On clay courts Lithen leads 2–0. Lithen has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Lithen has taken 4 sets to Jansson's 0. Their most recent meeting: John Hallquist Lithen won at M15 Bastad (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorHallquist LithenJansson
Wins in straight sets73%80%
Wins a set when losing25%43%
Goes to a deciding set26%33%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite52%25%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog36%20%
Tiebreak sets won54%0%
Wins after taking set 187%71%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 178%57%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 2 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hallquist Lithen 2, Jansson 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Lithen

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Jansson

🧱 The Wall

Elite returnerLow unforced errorsExtreme consistencyPhysical endurance

Matchup analysis

βš”οΈ The Gladiator vs 🧱 The Wall is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 383 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Aug 20, 2026

M15 Bastad

C Clay Β· 1st Round

60
62
Lithen

Aug 13, 2026

M15 Malmo

C Clay Β· 2nd Round

75
61
Lithen

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeLithenJansson
1 or more46%75%
3 or more6%25%
5 or more3%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricLithenJansson
W-L23–95–3
Avg odds1.591.78
ROI %-2.1%-32.0%
Units P/L-0.68u-2.56u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Lithen and Jansson posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentLithenJansson
Benjamin Azar
W
64
60
W
61
61

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Lithen
LWWWLWWW
L

Naoto Tomizawa

M15 Ann Arbor Β· Quarterfinals

647
766
26

Oct 2

W

Benjamin Azar

M15 Ann Arbor Β· 2nd Round

64
60

Oct 1

W

Benjamin Azar

M15 Ann Arbor Β· 2nd Round

64
60

Oct 1

W

Benjamin Thomas George

M15 Ann Arbor Β· 1st Round

63
63

Sep 29

L

Charlie Swaine

M15 Columbia Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Sep 24

W

Alexander Bernard

M15 Columbia Β· 1st Round

63
62

Sep 23

W

Linus Lagerbohm

M15 Szczawno Β· Final

64
64

Sep 6

W

Pawel Juszczak

M15 Szczawno Β· Semifinals

62
60

Sep 5

Jansson
LWWLWWWL
L

John Hallquist Lithen

M15 Bastad Β· 1st Round

06
26

Aug 20

W

Eric Ahren Moonga

M15 Bastad Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

61
64

Aug 18

W

Joshua Leon-Nestler

M15 Bastad Β· 1st Round Qualifying

61
61

Aug 17

L

John Hallquist Lithen

M15 Malmo Β· 2nd Round

57
16

Aug 13

W

Jonathan Ekstrand

M15 Malmo Β· 1st Round

60
60

Aug 12

W

Jose Von Hafe Perez

M15 Malmo Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

61
61

Aug 11

W

Serign Samba

M15 Malmo Β· 1st Round Qualifying

63
762

Aug 10

L

Ole Bredschneijder

M25 Gentofte Β· 1st Round

16
63
637

Jul 28

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ LithenLithen ahead↓ Jansson

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 12–81 matches

MetricLithenJansson
Matches won60%42%
Sets won58%46%
Games won55%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageLithenJansson
ITF M1520

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceLithenJansson
Clay20

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

John Hallquist Lithen vs Oskar Jansson FAQ

John Hallquist Lithen leads the head-to-head 2–0 over 2 meetings.