Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Joe Tyler vs Semen PankinPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Joe Tyler and Semen Pankin have met 1 time since 2025; Semen Pankin leads 1–0. Across all meetings Tyler has taken 0 sets to Pankin's 2. Their most recent meeting: Semen Pankin won at M15 Kayseri 7 (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorTylerPankin
Wins in straight sets—71%
Wins a set when losing0%40%
Goes to a deciding set0%33%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite0%55%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog0%58%
Tiebreak sets won0%45%
Wins after taking set 1—86%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1—71%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Tyler 0, Pankin 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Tyler

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Pankin

👑 The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer

Matchup analysis

The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 53% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 255 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Semen Pankin.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Sep 18, 2025

M15 Kayseri 7

H Hard · 2nd Round

57
46
Pankin

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricTylerPankin
W-L-5–11
Avg odds-2.32
ROI %--59.7%
Units P/L--9.55u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricTylerPankin
Countries—1
Events—1
Matches—1
Distance—0 mi · 0 km
Route—CHN

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Tyler and Pankin posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentTylerPankin
Vladimir Anatol Grintescu
W
75
26
108
W
62
64

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Tyler
LWLLWWLL
L

Nemanja Malesevic

M25 Nottingham · 3rd Round Qualifying

16
26

Apr 27

W

Vladimir Anatol Grintescu

M25 Nottingham · 1st Round Qualifying

75
26
108

Apr 26

L

Joseph Newman Billington

M25 Sheffield 1 · 1st Round Qualifying

26
46

Feb 1

L

Martin Doskocil

M25 Glasgow 1 · 1st Round

657
46

Jan 27

W

Alfie King

M25 Glasgow 1 · 3rd Round Qualifying

64
64

Jan 26

W

Nikolai Marin

M25 Glasgow 1 · 1st Round Qualifying

46
60
106

Jan 25

L

Matthew Summers

M25 Sheffield 1 · 1st Round

46
36

Oct 21

L

Semen Pankin

M15 Kayseri 7 · 2nd Round

57
46

Sep 18

Pankin
LLLLWLLL
L

Yosuke Watanuki

Jinan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

16
06

Oct 11

L

Marat Sharipov

Wuning 3 Challenger · 1st Round

57
46

Oct 5

L

Alex Bolt

Jingshan Challenger · 1st Round

36
26

Sep 29

L

Sheng Tang

M25 Yinchuan · 2nd Round

627
46

Sep 24

W

Yaojie Zeng

M25 Yinchuan · 1st Round

64
61

Sep 22

L

Elias Ymer

Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round

75
57
36

Sep 14

L

Alexis Galarneau

Shanghai Challenger · 1st Round

657
46

Sep 7

L

Yosuke Watanuki

Zhangjiagang Challenger · 1st Round

36
57

Aug 31

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 4–89 matches

MetricTylerPankin
Matches won0%66%
Sets won0%63%
Games won35%56%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageTylerPankin
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceTylerPankin
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Joe Tyler vs Semen Pankin FAQ

Semen Pankin leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.