Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jeremy Jahn vs Rudolf MollekerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jeremy Jahn and Rudolf Molleker have met 2 times since 2019; Jeremy Jahn leads 2โ€“0. Their first meeting came at Szczecin in 2019 on clay. On clay courts Jahn leads 2โ€“0. Jahn has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Jahn has taken 4 sets to Molleker's 1. Their most recent meeting: Jeremy Jahn won at Split (2023).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorJahnMolleker
Wins in straight setsโ€”65%
Wins a set when losingโ€”52%
Goes to a deciding setโ€”43%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”48%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”64%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”46%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”81%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”54%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Jahn 1, Molleker 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Jahn

๐Ÿงฑ The Wall

Elite returnerLow unforced errorsExtreme consistencyPhysical endurance
vs

Molleker

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter archetype wins about 56% vs ๐Ÿงฑ The Wall across 482 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Rudolf Molleker.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the wall's elite returner.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Apr 9, 2023

Split

C Clay ยท 1st Round Qualifying

63
46
62
Jahn

Sep 11, 2019

Szczecin

C Clay ยท Round of 32

64
63
Jahn

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricJahnMolleker
W-L-6โ€“7
Avg odds-2.01
ROI %--25.0%
Units P/L--3.25u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricJahnMolleker
Countriesโ€”2
Eventsโ€”3
Matchesโ€”5
Distanceโ€”490 mi ยท 788 km
Routeโ€”GER โ†’ CZE

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Jahn
LLLWWLLW
L

Moez Echargui

Braga ยท 1st Round Qualifying

16
26

Sep 24

L

Timo Stodder

Bad Waltersdorf ยท 1st Round Qualifying

6277
6477

Sep 17

L

Henri Laaksonen

Tulln ยท Round of 32

7765
46
6477

Sep 5

W

Maks Kasnikowski

Tulln ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

61
64

Sep 4

W

Kai Wehnelt

Tulln ยท 1st Round Qualifying

64
64

Sep 3

L

Oriol Roca Batalla

Karlsruhe ยท 1st Round Qualifying

62
16
57

Jul 2

L

Radu Albot

Split ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

36
57

Apr 10

W

Rudolf Molleker

Split ยท 1st Round Qualifying

63
46
62

Apr 9

Molleker
LWLWLLLW
L

Filip Cristian Jianu

Prague Challenger ยท 2nd Round

697
46

Aug 19

W

Matias Soto

Prague Challenger ยท 1st Round

63
63

Aug 18

L

Matej Dodig

Hamburg Challenger ยท 2nd Round

46
36

Aug 13

W

Elmer Moller

Hamburg Challenger ยท 1st Round

61
63

Aug 11

L

Maxim Mrva

Hagen Challenger ยท 1st Round

36
36

Aug 4

L

Dax Donders

Bunschoten challenger

657
64
36

Jul 12

L

Facundo Diaz Acosta

Braunschweig Challenger ยท 1st Round

36
63
46

Jul 7

W

Samuele Pieri

Braunschweig challenger

61
46
63

Jul 6

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ JahnJahn aheadโ†“ Molleker

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 60โ€“60 matches

MetricJahnMolleker
Matches won-52%
Sets won-53%
Games won-51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageJahnMolleker
ATP Challenger Tour20

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceJahnMolleker
Clay20

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jeremy Jahn vs Rudolf Molleker FAQ

Jeremy Jahn leads the head-to-head 2โ€“0 over 2 meetings.