Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jeremy Chardy vs Kei NishikoriPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jeremy Chardy and Kei Nishikori have met 4 times since 2015; Kei Nishikori leads 4–0. Their first meeting came at ATP Masters 1000 Paris in 2015 on hard. On clay courts Nishikori leads 2–0. On hard courts Nishikori leads 2–0. Nishikori has won the last 4 meetings. Across all meetings Chardy has taken 1 sets to Nishikori's 9. Their most recent meeting: Kei Nishikori won at Brisbane (2019).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorChardyNishikori
Wins in straight sets50%
Wins a set when losing50%
Goes to a deciding set50%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite44%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog80%
Tiebreak sets won50%
Wins after taking set 186%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 157%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Chardy 0, Nishikori 2).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Chardy

👑 The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Nishikori

🎯 Baseliner

Precise groundstrokesCourt controlPatient constructionConsistent depth

Matchup analysis

The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 56% vs 👑 The Complete Package across 179 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Kei Nishikori.

Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the the complete package's elite serve & return.

Previous meetings

4 career meetings, newest first

Jan 5, 2019

Brisbane

H Hard · Semifinals

26
26
Nishikori

May 31, 2017

Roland Garros

C Clay · Round of 64

36
06
6577
Nishikori

Apr 13, 2016

Barcelona

C Clay · Round of 16

36
57
Nishikori

Nov 4, 2015

ATP Masters 1000 Paris

H Hard · Round of 32

6477
7866
16
Nishikori

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricChardyNishikori
W-L-1–1
Avg odds-3.62
ROI %-+10.5%
Units P/L-+0.21u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Chardy
LLLLLWLL
L

Carlos Alcaraz

Wimbledon · Round of 128

06
26
57

Jul 4

L

Mackenzie McDonald

London / Queen's Club · 1st Round Qualifying

26
6477

Jun 17

L

Lorenzo Sonego

ATP Masters 1000 Rome · Round of 128

26
16

May 11

L

Hugo Gaston

ATP Masters 1000 Madrid · Round of 128

36
46

Apr 26

L

Daniel Evans

Australian Open · Round of 64

46
46
16

Jan 19

W

Daniel Elahi Galan

Australian Open · Round of 128

16
75
61
64

Jan 5

L

Matteo Berrettini

US Open · Round of 128

6577
6779
36

Aug 30

L

Tennys Sandgren

ATP Masters 1000 Cincinnati · 1st Round Qualifying

6678
16

Aug 1

Nishikori
LWLWLWLL
L

Rafael Jodar

Citi Open - Washington · 2nd Round

36
26

Jul 30

W

Juncheng Shang

Citi Open - Washington · 1st Round

637
63
64

Jul 28

L

Jack Kennedy

Savannah Challenger · 2nd Round

36
763
06

Apr 22

W

Colton Smith

Savannah Challenger · 1st Round

62
63

Apr 20

L

Yibing Wu

Sarasota Challenger · 2nd Round

36
63
16

Apr 9

W

Nicolas Kicker

Sarasota Challenger · 1st Round

63
62

Apr 7

L

Clement Tabur

Cherbourg Challenger · 1st Round

657
46

Mar 9

L

Nicolai Budkov Kjaer

Thionville Challenger · 2nd Round

63
46
26

Mar 4

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

ChardyNishikori aheadNishikori

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 14–14 matches

MetricChardyNishikori
Matches won-57%
Sets won-54%
Games won-52%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageChardyNishikori
Grand Slam01
ATP 50001
ATP 25001
ATP Masters 100001

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceChardyNishikori
Hard02
Clay02

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jeremy Chardy vs Kei Nishikori FAQ

Kei Nishikori leads the head-to-head 4–0 over 4 meetings.