Jenna Dean vs Piper CharneyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Jenna Dean and Piper Charney have met 1 time since 2026; Piper Charney leads 1–0. Across all meetings Dean has taken 0 sets to Charney's 2. Their most recent meeting: Piper Charney won at W35 Florence (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Dean | Charney | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Jenna Dean | Piper Charney | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 100% | 6/6 | 100% | 10/10 |
| Wins a set when losing | 6% | 1/17 | 33% | 2/6 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 4% | 1/23 | 13% | 2/16 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 80% | 4/5 | 63% | 5/8 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 7% | 1/14 | 40% | 2/5 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 60% | 3/5 | 100% | 1/1 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 86% | 6/7 | 91% | 10/11 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 86% | 6/7 | 91% | 10/11 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Dean 0, Charney 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Dean
💥 Big Hitter
Charney
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 7,733 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Jenna Dean.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 28, 2026
W35 Florence
H Hard · 3rd Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Dean | Charney |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 5–2 |
| Avg odds | 5.63 | 1.66 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +15.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | +1.08u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Dean | Charney |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 1 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | MNE | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Dean and Charney posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Dean | Charney |
|---|---|---|
| Mckenzie Barth | W 62 60 | W 61 62 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Juliana Nicole Singeorzan
W15 Nashville · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Piper Charney
W35 Florence · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 28
Mckenzie Barth
W35 Florence · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 27
Zimora Mcknight
W35 Dallas · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Ariana Gilbert
W35 Rome · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 22
Kylie Collins
W100 Sumter · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 1
Clervie Ngounoue
W35 Wichita · 1st Round
May 26
Sofia Johnson
W100 Indian Harbour Beach · 1st Round Qualifying
May 4
Jia Jing Lu
W35 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 5
Annika Penickova
W35 Florence · Final
Aug 2
Mayu Crossley
W35 Florence · Semifinals
Aug 1
Jo Yee Chan
W35 Florence · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Yiming Dang
W35 Florence · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Christasha Mcneil
W35 Florence · 1st Round
Jul 29
Jenna Dean
W35 Florence · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 28
Amaliia Elizarova
W35 Florence · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 27
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 16–23 matches
| Metric | Dean | Charney |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 26% | 63% |
| Sets won | 28% | 65% |
| Games won | 40% | 57% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Dean | Charney |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W35 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Dean | Charney |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.