Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jay Friend vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jay Friend and Strong Kirchheimer have met 2 times since 2026; Jay Friend leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at M25 Winston-Salem 1 in 2026 on hard. On hard courts Friend leads 2–0. Friend has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Friend has taken 4 sets to Kirchheimer's 1. Their most recent meeting: Jay Friend won at M25 Laval (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorFriendKirchheimer
Wins in straight sets59%55%
Wins a set when losing55%28%
Goes to a deciding set45%37%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite46%38%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog67%47%
Tiebreak sets won60%46%
Wins after taking set 186%82%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 159%61%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Friend 1, Kirchheimer 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Friend

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game
vs

Kirchheimer

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 54% vs βš™οΈ Grinder across 337 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Jay Friend.

All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jul 11, 2026

M25 Laval

H Hard Β· Quarterfinals

762
36
64
Friend

Jan 8, 2026

M25 Winston-Salem 1

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

64
62
Friend

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeFriendKirchheimer
1 or more100%100%
3 or more71%38%
5 or more43%0%
10 or more14%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricFriendKirchheimer
W-L8–28–4
Avg odds1.322.05
ROI %+3.1%-0.3%
Units P/L+0.31u-0.03u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Friend has a higher win rate against shared opponents (80% vs Kirchheimer's 40%).

OpponentFriendKirchheimer
Edward Winter
W
67
63
62
W
63
76
Cole Thurgur
W
64
62
W
64
64
Braden Shick
L
67
46
L
67
61
26
Spencer Johnson
W
63
46
64
L
57
36
Stefan Kozlov
W
62
46
63
L
06
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Friend
LLWWWWLW
L

Yuta Shimizu

Granby challenger

26
64
26

Jul 14

L

Keegan Rice

M25 Laval Β· Semifinals

57
26

Jul 11

W

Strong Kirchheimer

M25 Laval Β· Quarterfinals

762
36
64

Jul 11

W

Cole Thurgur

M25 Laval Β· 2nd Round

64
62

Jul 9

W

Eloi Roux

M25 Laval Β· 1st Round

61
61

Jul 8

W

Eloi Roux

Futures 2026

61
61

Jul 8

L

Braden Shick

Cary Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

667
46

Jul 3

W

Alex Martinez

Cary Challenger Β· 2nd Round

61
62

Jul 2

Kirchheimer
LWWLWWWW
L

Philip Sekulic

Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
06

Jul 14

W

Edward Winter

Granby challenger

63
762

Jul 13

W

Kody Pearson

Granby challenger

64
61

Jul 12

L

Jay Friend

M25 Laval Β· Quarterfinals

627
63
46

Jul 11

W

Tristan Stringer

Futures 2026

36
61
764

Jul 10

W

Miko Lapalme

M25 Laval Β· 1st Round

64
64

Jul 9

W

Tristan Stringer

M25 Laval Β· 2nd Round

36
61
764

Jul 9

W

Miko Lapalme

Futures 2026

64
64

Jul 9

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ FriendFriend ahead↓ Kirchheimer

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 33–63 matches

MetricFriendKirchheimer
Matches won67%49%
Sets won62%48%
Games won54%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageFriendKirchheimer
ITF M2520

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceFriendKirchheimer
Hard20

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jay Friend vs Strong Kirchheimer FAQ

Jay Friend leads the head-to-head 2–0 over 2 meetings.