Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jan Kobierski vs John Hallquist LithenPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jan Kobierski and John Hallquist Lithen have met 1 time since 2026; John Hallquist Lithen leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kobierski has taken 0 sets to Lithen's 2. Their most recent meeting: John Hallquist Lithen won at M15 Wels (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorKobierskiHallquist Lithen
Wins in straight sets100%73%
Wins a set when losing0%25%
Goes to a deciding set0%26%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteβ€”52%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog0%36%
Tiebreak sets won67%54%
Wins after taking set 1100%87%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%78%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kobierski 0, Hallquist Lithen 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Kobierski

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Lithen

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

The βš”οΈ The Gladiator archetype wins about 60% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 48 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward John Hallquist Lithen.

The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 29, 2026

M15 Wels

C Clay Β· 1st Round

26
36
Lithen

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricKobierskiLithen
W-L0–223–9
Avg odds7.261.59
ROI %-100.0%-2.1%
Units P/L-2.00u-0.68u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricKobierskiLithen
Countries1β€”
Events1β€”
Matches1β€”
Distance0 mi Β· 0 kmβ€”
RouteUSAβ€”

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Kobierski
LLLLWWLL
L

Spencer Johnson

San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

637
36

Sep 20

L

John Hallquist Lithen

M15 Wels Β· 1st Round

26
36

Jul 29

L

Max Wiskandt

M25 Kramsach Β· 1st Round

16
57

Jul 15

L

David Naharro

M15 Slovenska Bistrica Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

16
06

Jun 23

W

Alexander Gschiel

Futures 2026

75
764

Jun 22

W

Alexander Gschiel

M15 Slovenska Bistrica Β· 1st Round Qualifying

75
764

Jun 22

L

Nathan Ponwith

M15 Huntsville AL Β· Round of 32

26
46

Aug 13

L

Marlon Vankan

M15 Wels Β· Round of 32

16
36

Jul 30

Lithen
LWWWLWWW
L

Naoto Tomizawa

M15 Ann Arbor Β· Quarterfinals

647
766
26

Oct 2

W

Benjamin Azar

M15 Ann Arbor Β· 2nd Round

64
60

Oct 1

W

Benjamin Azar

M15 Ann Arbor Β· 2nd Round

64
60

Oct 1

W

Benjamin Thomas George

M15 Ann Arbor Β· 1st Round

63
63

Sep 29

L

Charlie Swaine

M15 Columbia Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Sep 24

W

Alexander Bernard

M15 Columbia Β· 1st Round

63
62

Sep 23

W

Linus Lagerbohm

M15 Szczawno Β· Final

64
64

Sep 6

W

Pawel Juszczak

M15 Szczawno Β· Semifinals

62
60

Sep 5

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 6–81 matches

MetricKobierskiLithen
Matches won33%60%
Sets won33%58%
Games won40%55%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageKobierskiLithen
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceKobierskiLithen
Clay01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jan Kobierski vs John Hallquist Lithen FAQ

John Hallquist Lithen leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.