Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Jan Hrazdil vs Tomas LanikPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Jan Hrazdil and Tomas Lanik have met 1 time since 2026; Tomas Lanik leads 1–0. Across all meetings Hrazdil has taken 0 sets to Lanik's 2. Their most recent meeting: Tomas Lanik won at M25 Ollersbach (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorHrazdilLanik
Wins in straight sets73%88%
Wins a set when losing22%25%
Goes to a deciding set24%20%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite13%80%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog45%42%
Tiebreak sets won27%50%
Wins after taking set 173%88%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 173%88%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hrazdil 0, Lanik 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Hrazdil

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Lanik

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

Both Jan Hrazdil and Tomas Lanik are βš™οΈ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 654 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 22, 2026

M25 Ollersbach

C Clay Β· 1st Round

16
16
Lanik

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeHrazdilLanik
1 or more70%100%
3 or more40%82%
5 or more20%55%
10 or more0%27%
15 or more0%9%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricHrazdilLanik
W-L4–108–7
Avg odds2.772.73
ROI %-60.7%-16.3%
Units P/L-8.50u-2.44u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricHrazdilLanik
Countries23
Events23
Matches33
Distanceβ€”β€”
RoutePOL β†’ HUNSVK β†’ AUT β†’ HUN

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 2 shared opponents, both Hrazdil and Lanik posted a 50% win rate.

OpponentHrazdilLanik
Wiktor Jez
W
61
62
W
62
62
Vadym Ursu
L
26
64
46
L
46
36

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Hrazdil
LWWLWLLL
L

Preston Brown

M15 Pecs Β· 1st Round

36
46

Aug 26

W

Wiktor Jez

M15 Krakow Β· 1st Round

61
62

Aug 18

W

Wiktor Jez

M15 Krakow Β· 1st Round

61
62

Aug 18

L

Linus Lagerbohm

M15 Bielsko Biala Β· 2nd Round

36
26

Aug 6

W

Matteo Fondriest

M15 Bielsko Biala Β· 1st Round

75
64

Aug 5

L

Tiago Pereira

M25 Koszalin Β· 1st Round

36
06

Jul 29

L

Tomas Lanik

M25 Ollersbach Β· 1st Round

16
16

Jul 22

L

Matteo Fondriest

M15 Nova Gorica Β· 1st Round

62
57
36

Jul 15

Lanik
LLWWLWLW
L

John Sperle

M15 Pecs Β· 1st Round

06
57

Aug 26

L

Alexander Wagner

M15 Mistelbach Β· 2nd Round

57
677

Aug 20

W

Jure Siftar

M15 Mistelbach Β· 1st Round

62
62

Aug 19

W

Jure Siftar

M15 Mistelbach Β· 1st Round

62
62

Aug 19

L

Karol Filar

M15 Poprad Β· 1st Round

64
647
617

Aug 5

W

Jan Hrazdil

M25 Ollersbach Β· 1st Round

61
61

Jul 22

L

Gabriele Bosio

M15 Nova Gorica Β· Quarterfinals

667
16

Jul 17

W

Nicolas Parizzia

M15 Nova Gorica Β· 2nd Round

64
63

Jul 16

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 20–38 matches

MetricHrazdilLanik
Matches won29%40%
Sets won33%43%
Games won44%48%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageHrazdilLanik
ITF M2501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceHrazdilLanik
Clay01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Jan Hrazdil vs Tomas Lanik FAQ

Tomas Lanik leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.