James Trotter vs Mitsuki Wei Kang LeongPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Zhangjiagang Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- Quarterfinals
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- September 3 · 11:00 PM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
Priced around 1.46 or shorter, James Kent Trotter has won 28 of 45 matches, 62% against a fair-price expectation of 71%.
Book prices only, with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Sample sizes below ten are not shown.
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong and James Kent Trotter meet in the quarterfinals of the Zhangjiajiang Challenger on hard court September 3. Leong sits at number 551 in the rankings while Trotter is ranked 464, separated by a gap that reflects their recent trajectories on hard courts where Leong has posted a 14-6 record and Trotter 10-10.
Both players arrive on momentum. Leong has won four straight and sits at 70% over his last ten matches, while Trotter runs a two-match streak and owns 80% in his last five outings. The two have never met. They split results against common opponents, with Trotter beating Dan Added where Leong fell short, though both lost to Kasidit Samrej on separate occasions.
Leong constructs points from the baseline, comfortable breaking down opponents through positioning and counterattack rather than power initiation. Trotter relies on his serve as a primary weapon and builds from there. The contrast is stark: Leong must read and respond to Trotter's first-serve pace while staying patient; Trotter needs to convert opportunities off the break and avoid getting drawn into extended rallies where Leong thrives.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Trotter | Wei Kang Leong | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | James Trotter | Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 56% | 14/25 | 62% | 26/42 |
| Wins a set when losing | 55% | 11/20 | 38% | 11/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 49% | 22/45 | 38% | 27/71 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 26% | 7/27 | 26% | 5/19 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 80% | 8/10 | 80% | 8/10 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 42% | 11/26 | 28% | 5/18 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 19/23 | 80% | 32/40 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 61% | 14/23 | 65% | 26/40 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Trotter
🤖 Servebot
Leong
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,441 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward James Trotter.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Trotter and Leong have never faced each other on tour.
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Trotter | Leong | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | James Trotter | Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 3/3 | 100% | 12/12 |
| 3 or more | 67% | 2/3 | 58% | 7/12 |
| 5 or more | 67% | 2/3 | 25% | 3/12 |
| 10 or more | 33% | 1/3 | 0% | 0/12 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/3 | 0% | 0/12 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/3 | 0% | 0/12 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Trotter | Leong |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–4 | 5–1 |
| Avg odds | 1.48 | 1.55 |
| ROI % | -31.4% | +27.3% |
| Units P/L | -2.20u | +1.64u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Trotter | Leong |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 2 |
| Events | 1 | 2 |
| Matches | 1 | 6 |
| Distance | 0 mi · 0 km | 2,801 mi · 4,508 km |
| Route | CHN | KAZ → CHN |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 4 shared opponents, both Trotter and Leong posted a 50% win rate.
| Opponent | Trotter | Leong |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Added | W 64 62 | L 46 67 |
| Ilyas Milad Fahim | L 46 62 57 | W 26 60 75 |
| Kasidit Samrej | L 63 57 16 | L 36 67 |
| Kuan-Yi Lee | W 63 76 | W 75 63 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
Zhangjiagang Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 2
Hayato Matsuoka
Vancouver Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 28
Mikael Arseneault
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 27
Kokoro Isomura
Winnipeg Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 20
Guillaume Dalmasso
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 19
Benjamin Thomas George
Granby Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Jared Horwood
Granby Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Quinn Vandecasteele
Newport Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 7
Koki Matsuda
Zhangjiagang Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 2
Petr Bar Biryukov
Zhangjiagang Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 1
Dominik Palan
Zhangjiagang Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 31
Weiyi Kong
Zhangjiagang Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 30
Erik Arutiunian
Astana Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 10
Yerassyl Yerdilda
Astana Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 9
Dominik Palan
Segovia Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 20
Alberto Barroso Campos
Segovia Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 19
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 45–72 matches
| Metric | Trotter | Leong |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 56% | 60% |
| Sets won | 54% | 56% |
| Games won | 52% | 54% |