James Kent Trotter vs Liam DraxlPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
James Kent Trotter and Liam Draxl have met 1 time since 2026; Liam Draxl leads 1–0. Across all meetings Trotter has taken 1 sets to Draxl's 2. Their most recent meeting: Liam Draxl won at Granby Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kent Trotter | Draxl | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | James Kent Trotter | Liam Draxl | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 67% | 2/3 | 55% | 18/33 |
| Wins a set when losing | 67% | 2/3 | 32% | 9/28 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 50% | 3/6 | 39% | 24/61 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 1/2 | 44% | 16/36 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 50% | 10/20 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 100% | 1/1 | 50% | 13/26 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 50% | 2/4 | 81% | 26/32 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 50% | 2/4 | 56% | 18/32 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kent Trotter 0, Draxl 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Trotter
🤖 Servebot
Draxl
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 752 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward James Kent Trotter.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 15, 2026
Granby Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Trotter | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 11–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.67 |
| ROI % | - | -20.2% |
| Units P/L | - | -3.83u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Trotter | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 1,911 mi · 3,076 km |
| Route | — | CAN → JAM |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Draxl has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Trotter's 0%).
| Opponent | Trotter | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Clement Chidekh | L 16 26 | W 76 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Tyler Zink
Vancouver Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 29
Clement Chidekh
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 21
Liam Draxl
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 15
Sora Fukuda
M15 Nishi-Tokyo · Quarterfinals
Mar 20
Karol Filar
M15 Nishi-Tokyo · Round of 16
Mar 19
Kuan Yi Lee
M15 Nishi-Tokyo · Round of 32
Mar 18
Andy Andrade
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Daniel Merida Aguilar
National Bank Open - Montreal · 1st Round
Aug 4
Toby Samuel
Winnipeg Challenger · Final
Jul 26
Shintaro Mochizuki
Winnipeg Challenger · Semifinals
Jul 25
Clement Chidekh
Winnipeg Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
August Holmgren
Winnipeg Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 24
Millen Hurrion
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 22
Arthur Gea
Granby Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 6–62 matches
| Metric | Trotter | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 50% | 53% |
| Sets won | 53% | 50% |
| Games won | 49% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Trotter | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Trotter | Draxl |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.