Jake Delaney vs Liam BroadyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Ningboo Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- Quarterfinals
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- October 30 · 3:00 AM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
At 2.95 or longer, Jake Delaney has won 7 of 28 (25%). That is level with the 24% the price implied.
At 1.36 or shorter, Liam Broady has won 85 of 101 (84%). The price implied 75%, so Liam Broady has beaten it by 9 points.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Jake Delaney and Liam Broady meet next at the Ningboo Challenger on October 30 on hard.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Delaney | Broady | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Jake Delaney | Liam Broady | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 70% | 42/60 | 68% | 28/41 |
| Wins a set when losing | 31% | 11/36 | 28% | 8/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 30% | 29/96 | 30% | 21/70 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 59% | 34/58 | 43% | 23/54 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 45% | 15/33 | 46% | 6/13 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 56% | 24/43 | 44% | 12/27 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 91% | 52/57 | 92% | 36/39 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 74% | 42/57 | 72% | 28/39 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Delaney
🤖 Servebot
Broady
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,382 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Jake Delaney.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Delaney and Broady have never faced each other on tour.
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Delaney | Broady | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Jake Delaney | Liam Broady | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 18/18 | 100% | 8/8 |
| 3 or more | 94% | 17/18 | 50% | 4/8 |
| 5 or more | 89% | 16/18 | 38% | 3/8 |
| 10 or more | 50% | 9/18 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 15 or more | 28% | 5/18 | 0% | 0/8 |
| 20 or more | 6% | 1/18 | 0% | 0/8 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Delaney | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9–9 | 3–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.43 | 1.78 |
| ROI % | -5.1% | -58.3% |
| Units P/L | -0.93u | -5.25u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Delaney | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 1 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | FRA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Broady has a higher win rate against shared opponents (75% vs Delaney's 38%).
| Opponent | Delaney | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Hayato Matsuoka | W 26 76 76 | W 61 62 |
| Matthew Dellavedova | W 75 63 | W 64 60 |
| Yuta Shimizu | L 26 67 | L 26 57 |
| Andre Ilagan | L 46 76 67 | W 63 76 |
| James Trotter | L 67 63 16 | W 61 61 |
| Daniel Masur | W 64 64 | W 63 46 63 |
| Rio Noguchi | L 26 46 | L 16 36 |
| Carl Emil Overbeck | L 36 26 | W 60 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Yi Zhou
Ningboo Challenger · 2nd Round
Oct 29
Alexander Binda
Ningboo Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 27
Chak Pong Marco Lam
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 19
Marat Sharipov
Jinan Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 13
Ajeet Rai
Jinan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Unknown Player
M25 Darwin · Quarterfinals
Oct 9
Wihan Van Der Merwe
M25 Darwin · 2nd Round
Oct 8
Harrison Satara
M25 Darwin · 1st Round
Oct 7
Naoya Honda
Ningboo Challenger · 2nd Round
Oct 29
Sergey Fomin
Ningboo Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 27
Akira Santillan
Guangzhou Challenger · 2nd Round
Oct 22
Dominik Palan
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 20
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Roanne Challenger · 1st Round
Oct 12
Dominic Stricker
Mouilleron-Le-Captif Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 30
Marco Cecchinato
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 24
Dhakshineswar Suresh
Brownsburg Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 12
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 70–96 matches
| Metric | Delaney | Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 63% | 59% |
| Sets won | 59% | 56% |
| Games won | 53% | 55% |