Jacob Brumm vs Nathan PonwithPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Jacob Brumm and Nathan Ponwith have met 1 time since 2026; Nathan Ponwith leads 1–0. Across all meetings Brumm has taken 1 sets to Ponwith's 2. Their most recent meeting: Nathan Ponwith won at M25 Bakersfield 1 (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Brumm | Ponwith | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Jacob Brumm | Nathan Ponwith | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 42% | 5/12 | 57% | 4/7 |
| Wins a set when losing | 22% | 4/18 | 20% | 2/10 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 37% | 11/30 | 29% | 5/17 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 100% | 2/2 | 50% | 2/4 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 13/26 | 30% | 3/10 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 55% | 6/11 | 20% | 1/5 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 75% | 9/12 | 67% | 4/6 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 42% | 5/12 | 67% | 4/6 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Brumm 0, Ponwith 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brumm
⚙️ Grinder
Ponwith
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 71% vs 🏃 Pusher across 41 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Jacob Brumm.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Mar 18, 2026
M25 Bakersfield 1
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brumm | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–3 | 1–0 |
| Avg odds | 2.95 | 1.40 |
| ROI % | +33.0% | +40.0% |
| Units P/L | +1.98u | +0.40u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Brumm | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | — | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Brumm and Ponwith posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Brumm | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Blando | W 62 62 | W 75 62 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
M15 Huamantla · 1st Round
Jul 28
Noah Johnston
Futures 2026
Jul 9
Noah Johnston
M15 Rancho Santa Fe · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Michael Blando
M15 Rancho Santa Fe · 1st Round
Jul 8
Alexander Petrov
M15 San Diego · 2nd Round
Jul 2
William Kleege
Futures 2026
Jul 1
William Kleege
M15 San Diego · 1st Round
Jul 1
Jonathan Mridha
M15 Vero Beach · 1st Round
May 6
Oliver Okonkwo
M15 Champaign · 2nd Round
Aug 27
David Bakonyi
M15 Champaign · 1st Round
Aug 26
Branko Djuric
M25 Bakersfield 1 · 2nd Round
Mar 19
Jacob Brumm
M25 Bakersfield 1 · 1st Round
Mar 18
Stefan Kozlov
Arizona Tennis Classic · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 9
Robert Strombachs
M25 San Jose 1 · 2nd Round
Feb 18
Niccolo Catini
M25 San Jose 1 · 1st Round
Feb 17
Natan Rodrigues
M15 Huamantla 2 · Quarterfinals
Feb 6
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 17–30 matches
| Metric | Brumm | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 40% | 41% |
| Sets won | 39% | 41% |
| Games won | 45% | 47% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Brumm | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Brumm | Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.