Jacob Brumm vs Keaton HancePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Jacob Brumm and Keaton Hance have met 1 time since 2026; Keaton Hance leads 1–0. Across all meetings Brumm has taken 0 sets to Hance's 2. Their most recent meeting: Keaton Hance won at M15 Orlando (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Brumm | Hance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Jacob Brumm | Keaton Hance | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 40% | 4/10 | 81% | 17/21 |
| Wins a set when losing | 21% | 3/14 | 21% | 3/14 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 38% | 9/24 | 20% | 7/35 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 67% | 2/3 | 75% | 12/16 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 50% | 10/20 | 56% | 10/18 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 56% | 5/9 | 33% | 1/3 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 73% | 8/11 | 100% | 21/21 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 36% | 4/11 | 81% | 17/21 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Brumm 0, Hance 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brumm
🎾 All-Court
Hance
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
🎾 All-Court vs 🪃 Counterpuncher is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 878 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Apr 21, 2026
M15 Orlando
C Clay · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brumm | Hance |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 3–4 |
| Avg odds | 4.94 | 3.49 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | +22.9% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | +1.60u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Brumm | Hance |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 4 |
| Distance | — | 1,953 mi · 3,143 km |
| Route | — | USA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Brumm and Hance posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Brumm | Hance |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Blando | W 62 62 | W 60 61 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Johan Alexander Rodriguez
M15 Huamantla · 1st Round
Jul 28
Noah Johnston
Futures 2026
Jul 9
Noah Johnston
M15 Rancho Santa Fe · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Michael Blando
M15 Rancho Santa Fe · 1st Round
Jul 8
Alexander Petrov
M15 San Diego · 2nd Round
Jul 2
William Kleege
M15 San Diego · 1st Round
Jul 1
Jonathan Mridha
M15 Vero Beach · 1st Round
May 6
Keshav Chopra
M15 Orange Park · 1st Round
Apr 28
Duncan Chan
Columbus Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Michael Antonius
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 27
Nishesh Basavareddy
San Diego 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 24
Andres Martin
San Diego 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 23
Johannus Monday
M25 Edwardsville · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Naoya Honda
M25 Edwardsville · 1st Round
Jul 29
William Jansen
M25 Champaign · 1st Round
Jul 22
Jack Kennedy
M25 Mataro · Quarterfinals
May 22
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 24–35 matches
| Metric | Brumm | Hance |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 42% | 60% |
| Sets won | 40% | 58% |
| Games won | 46% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Brumm | Hance |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Brumm | Hance |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.