Jack Satterfield vs Oliver BondingPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πΊπΈJack Satterfield
#1309 Β· 19 yrs Β· U
11w41 meeting Β· sets 0β2
π¬π§Oliver Bonding
#714 Β· 19 yrs Β· R
TitleJack Satterfield and Oliver Bonding have met 1 time since 2026; Oliver Bonding leads 1β0. Across all meetings Satterfield has taken 0 sets to Bonding's 2. Their most recent meeting: Oliver Bonding won at M25 Edwardsville (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Satterfield | Bonding | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Jack Satterfield | Oliver Bonding | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 86% | 6/7 | 80% | 20/25 |
| Wins a set when losing | 25% | 2/8 | 27% | 4/15 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 20% | 3/15 | 23% | 9/40 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 100% | 3/3 | 61% | 14/23 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 55% | 6/11 | 67% | 10/15 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 75% | 3/4 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 100% | 6/6 | 88% | 22/25 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 100% | 6/6 | 80% | 20/25 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Satterfield 0, Bonding 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Satterfield
π‘οΈ The Spoiler
Bonding
π The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The π The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs π‘οΈ The Spoiler across 34 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Oliver Bonding.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 29, 2026
M25 Edwardsville
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0β2 | 13β5 |
| Avg odds | 2.71 | 1.73 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -1.7% |
| Units P/L | -2.00u | -0.31u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Bonding has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Satterfield's 0%).
| Opponent | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Sasha Rozin | L 16 16 | L 67 46 |
| Alexander Rozin | L 16 16 | L 67 46 |
| Oliver Ojakaar | L 36 26 | W 75 76 |
| Dmitry Popko | L 26 36 | W 62 76 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Oliver Bonding
M25 Edwardsville Β· 1st Round
Jul 29
Naoya Honda
M25 Champaign Β· 1st Round
Jul 22
Sasha Rozin
Futures 2026
Jun 27
Alexander Rozin
M15 Claremont Β· Semifinals
Jun 27
Lorenzo Claverie
M15 Claremont Β· Quarterfinals
Jun 26
Joshua Peck
M15 Claremont Β· 2nd Round
Jun 25
Noah Zamora
M15 Claremont Β· 1st Round
Jun 24
Spencer Johnson
M15 Irvine Β· 2nd Round
Jun 18
Max Dahlin
M15 Ann Arbor Β· Final
Oct 4
Hugo Coquelin
M15 Ann Arbor Β· Semifinals
Oct 3
Nikola Djosic
M15 Ann Arbor Β· Quarterfinals
Oct 2
Marko Mesarovic
M15 Ann Arbor Β· 2nd Round
Oct 1
Matthew Thomson
M15 Ann Arbor Β· 1st Round
Sep 30
Sean Daryabeigi
M15 Columbia Β· Final
Sep 27
Gabe Avram
M15 Columbia Β· Semifinals
Sep 26
Novak Novakovic
M15 Columbia Β· 2nd Round
Sep 25
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 15β40 matches
| Metric | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 47% | 63% |
| Sets won | 48% | 61% |
| Games won | 48% | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.