Jack Satterfield vs Oliver BondingPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Jack Satterfield and Oliver Bonding have met 1 time since 2026; Oliver Bonding leads 1–0. Across all meetings Satterfield has taken 0 sets to Bonding's 2. Their most recent meeting: Oliver Bonding won at M25 Edwardsville (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Satterfield | Bonding | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Jack Satterfield | Oliver Bonding | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 80% | 8/10 | 87% | 13/15 |
| Wins a set when losing | 22% | 2/9 | 31% | 4/13 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 21% | 4/19 | 21% | 6/28 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 100% | 3/3 | 62% | 8/13 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 54% | 7/13 | 67% | 8/12 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 83% | 5/6 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 100% | 8/8 | 82% | 14/17 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 100% | 8/8 | 76% | 13/17 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Satterfield 0, Bonding 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Satterfield
⚙️ Grinder
Bonding
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 337 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Oliver Bonding.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 29, 2026
M25 Edwardsville
H Hard · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Satterfield | Bonding | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Jack Satterfield | Oliver Bonding | ||
| 1 or more | 67% | 8/12 | 100% | 14/14 |
| 3 or more | 25% | 3/12 | 79% | 11/14 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/12 | 36% | 5/14 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/12 | 0% | 0/14 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/12 | 0% | 0/14 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/12 | 0% | 0/14 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–6 | 9–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.43 | 2.05 |
| ROI % | +5.4% | -2.0% |
| Units P/L | +0.70u | -0.30u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 1 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 0 mi · 0 km |
| Route | — | GBR |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Bonding has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Satterfield's 0%).
| Opponent | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Sasha Rozin | L 16 16 | L 67 46 |
| Alexander Rozin | L 16 16 | L 67 46 |
| Oliver Ojakaar | L 36 26 | W 75 76 |
| Dmitry Popko | L 26 36 | W 62 76 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Oliver Bonding
M25 Edwardsville · 1st Round
Jul 29
Naoya Honda
M25 Champaign · 1st Round
Jul 22
Sasha Rozin
Futures 2026
Jun 27
Alexander Rozin
M15 Claremont · Semifinals
Jun 27
Lorenzo Claverie
Futures 2026
Jun 26
Lorenzo Claverie
M15 Claremont · Quarterfinals
Jun 26
Joshua Peck
M15 Claremont · 2nd Round
Jun 25
Noah Zamora
M15 Claremont · 1st Round
Jun 24
Oliver Tarvet
Roehampton 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 26
Viktor Durasovic
Roehampton 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Ozan Baris
M25 Edwardsville · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Jack Satterfield
M25 Edwardsville · 1st Round
Jul 29
Evan Bynoe
M25 Champaign · 1st Round
Jul 21
Timo Legout
M25 Louisville · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Youssef Kadiri Hassani
M25 Louisville · 1st Round
Jul 14
Arda Azkara
Nottingham 3 Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 7
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 19–28 matches
| Metric | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 53% | 54% |
| Sets won | 52% | 55% |
| Games won | 49% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Satterfield | Bonding |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.