Ivan Gakhov vs Sem VerbeekPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Ivan Gakhov and Sem Verbeek have met 1 time since 2022; Ivan Gakhov leads 1–0. Across all meetings Gakhov has taken 2 sets to Verbeek's 0. Their most recent meeting: Ivan Gakhov won at Amersfoort (2022).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Gakhov | Verbeek | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Ivan Gakhov | Sem Verbeek | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 58% | 18/31 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 36% | 8/22 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 40% | 21/53 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 38% | 9/24 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 72% | 13/18 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 45% | 9/20 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 90% | 26/29 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 62% | 18/29 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Gakhov 1, Verbeek 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gakhov
🪃 Counterpuncher
Verbeek
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 1,208 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 10, 2022
Amersfoort
C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gakhov | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.82 | - |
| ROI % | -33.6% | - |
| Units P/L | -2.35u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Gakhov | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 5 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | ESP | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alexander Ritschard
M25 Oviedo · Semifinals
Aug 28
Yanaki Milev
M25 Oviedo · Quarterfinals
Aug 27
Samuel De Felipe Garcia
M25 Oviedo · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Enrique Carrascosa Diaz
M25 Oviedo · 1st Round
Aug 25
Ignacio Parisca
M25 Santander · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Ignacio Parisca
M25 Santander · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Madhwin Kamath
M25 Santander · 1st Round
Aug 18
Nikolai Barsukov
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Daniil Glinka
St. Brieuc · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 19
Yunchaokete Bu
Quimper · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 23
Ivan Gakhov
Amersfoort · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 10
Martin Krumich
Luedenscheid · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 26
Evan Furness
Ostrava · 2nd Round Qualifying
Apr 25
Georgii Kravchenko
Ostrava · 1st Round Qualifying
Apr 24
Gastao Elias
Porto · Round of 32
Jun 30
Francisco Cabral
Porto · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 28
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 53–53 matches
| Metric | Gakhov | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 58% | - |
| Sets won | 55% | - |
| Games won | 52% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Gakhov | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Gakhov | Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.