Inigo Cervantes vs Norbert GombosPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Inigo Cervantes and Norbert Gombos have met 4 times since 2015; they are level 2–2. Their first meeting came at Prague in 2015 on clay. On clay courts Cervantes leads 2–1. Across all meetings Cervantes has taken 5 sets to Gombos's 4. Their most recent meeting: Inigo Cervantes won at Braunschweig (2016).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Cervantes | Gombos | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Inigo Cervantes | Norbert Gombos | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 57% | 16/28 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 28% | 7/25 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 36% | 19/53 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 50% | 12/24 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 55% | 16/29 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 55% | 11/20 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 86% | 24/28 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 57% | 16/28 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 3 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Cervantes 2, Gombos 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cervantes
💥 Big Hitter
Gombos
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,211 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Inigo Cervantes.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
4 career meetings, newest first
Jul 6, 2016
Braunschweig
C Clay · Round of 32
Oct 26, 2015
Valencia
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 27, 2015
Hamburg
C Clay · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 11, 2015
Prague
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cervantes | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 13–10 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.26 |
| ROI % | - | +1.4% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.33u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Cervantes | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 6 |
| Distance | — | 55 mi · 88 km |
| Route | — | CZE |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Pol Martin Tiffon
Seville · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Gerard Campana Lee
Porto 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Giorgio Ricca
Todi · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 11
Roberto Carballes Baena
Seville · Round of 32
Sep 5
Gastao Elias
Seville · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 4
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Seville · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 4
Filip Cristian Jianu
Alicante · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 2
Daniel Michalski
Lisbon · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 25
Chun-Hsin Tseng
Prague Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 21
Radu Mihai Papoe
Prague Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 20
Sean Cuenin
Prague Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Prague Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Gonzalo Bueno
Liberec Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 1
Kilian Feldbausch
Liberec Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Franco Roncadelli
Liberec Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Matyas Cerny
Liberec Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 28
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 53–53 matches
| Metric | Cervantes | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 53% |
| Sets won | - | 50% |
| Games won | - | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Cervantes | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| ATP 500 | 1 | 0 |
| ATP 250 | 0 | 1 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Cervantes | Gombos |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
| Clay | 2 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.