Ilyas Milad Fahim vs James TrotterPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Ilyas Milad Fahim and James Trotter have met 1 time since 2026; Ilyas Milad Fahim leads 1–0. Across all meetings Fahim has taken 2 sets to Trotter's 1. Their most recent meeting: Ilyas Milad Fahim won at M25 Tulsa (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Milad Fahim | Trotter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Ilyas Milad Fahim | James Trotter | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 50% | 3/6 | 62% | 13/21 |
| Wins a set when losing | 25% | 1/4 | 53% | 10/19 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 40% | 4/10 | 45% | 18/40 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 0% | 0/1 | 22% | 5/23 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 60% | 3/5 | 86% | 6/7 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 0% | 0/1 | 43% | 10/23 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 83% | 5/6 | 80% | 16/20 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 50% | 3/6 | 65% | 13/20 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Milad Fahim 0, Trotter 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Fahim
🧱 The Wall
Trotter
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 62% vs 🧱 The Wall across 266 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward James Trotter.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the wall's elite returner.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 17, 2026
M25 Tulsa
H Hard · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Fahim | Trotter | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Ilyas Milad Fahim | James Trotter | ||
| 1 or more | 71% | 5/7 | 100% | 9/9 |
| 3 or more | 29% | 2/7 | 100% | 9/9 |
| 5 or more | 14% | 1/7 | 67% | 6/9 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 11% | 1/9 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/9 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/7 | 0% | 0/9 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Fahim | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–2 | 4–1 |
| Avg odds | 2.30 | 1.96 |
| ROI % | -22.3% | +61.7% |
| Units P/L | -0.89u | +3.08u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Fahim | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 6 |
| Distance | — | 7,954 mi · 12,800 km |
| Route | — | CHN → USA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Fahim and Trotter posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Fahim | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Kayden Colombo | W 64 75 | W 61 60 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
William Jansen
M25 Champaign · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Hiroki Sakagawa
M25 Champaign · 1st Round
Jul 22
Michael Antonius
M15 Rochester · Semifinals
Jul 19
Kayden Colombo
M15 Rochester · 2nd Round
Jul 17
Dakotah Bobo
M15 Rochester · Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Kayden Colombo
M15 Rochester · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Simon Caldwell
M15 Rochester · 1st Round
Jul 15
J.J. Wolf
M25 Tulsa · 2nd Round
Jun 18
Stefan Kozlov
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 29
Li Tu
Columbus Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 27
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Guangzhou Challenger · 2nd Round
Sep 17
Federico Cina
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 16
Thomas Fancutt
Guangzhou Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Ziyu Liu
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 13
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Zhangjiagang Challenger · Quarterfinals
Sep 4
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 10–40 matches
| Metric | Fahim | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 60% | 53% |
| Sets won | 54% | 53% |
| Games won | 51% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Fahim | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Fahim | Trotter |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.