Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Heather Watson vs Kateryna BondarenkoPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Heather Watson and Kateryna Bondarenko have met 4 times since 2016; Heather Watson leads 3–1. Their first meeting came at Strasbourg in 2016 on clay. On clay courts they are level 1–1. On hard courts Watson leads 2–0. Watson has won the last 3 meetings. Across all meetings Watson has taken 7 sets to Bondarenko's 3. Their most recent meeting: Heather Watson won at Acapulco (2020).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorWatsonBondarenko
Wins in straight sets64%β€”
Wins a set when losing42%β€”
Goes to a deciding set38%β€”
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite42%β€”
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog71%β€”
Tiebreak sets won50%β€”
Wins after taking set 180%β€”
Wins 2-0 after taking set 160%β€”

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Watson 2, Bondarenko 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Watson

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Bondarenko

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

The πŸ’₯ Big Hitter archetype wins about 60% vs βš™οΈ Grinder across 1,462 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Heather Watson.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

4 career meetings, newest first

Feb 27, 2020

Acapulco

H Hard Β· Round of 16

7762
62
Watson

Oct 9, 2019

Tianjin

H Hard Β· Round of 32

64
7763
Watson

May 23, 2018

Nurnberg

C Clay Β· Round of 32

63
36
7763
Watson

May 18, 2016

Strasbourg

C Clay Β· Round of 32

36
60
16
Bondarenko

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricWatsonBondarenko
W-L3–3-
Avg odds2.42-
ROI %+20.0%-
Units P/L+1.20u-

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Watson
LWWLLWLW
L

Harriet Dart

U.S. Open - New York Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

62
46
16

Aug 28

W

Angela Fita Boluda

U.S. Open - New York Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

64
57
765

Aug 26

W

Claire Liu

U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round Qualifying

46
62
64

Aug 24

L

Anna Blinkova

National Bank Open - Toronto Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

26
57

Aug 1

L

Julieta Pareja

Mubadala DC Open - Washington Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

46
63
57

Jul 26

W

Kamilla Rakhimova

Mubadala DC Open - Washington Β· 1st Round Qualifying

762
764

Jul 25

L

Maria Timofeeva

Wimbledon - London Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

63
26
16

Jun 25

W

Tatiana Prozorova

Wimbledon - London Β· 2nd Round Qualifying

57
63
75

Jun 24

Bondarenko
LLLLWLLL
L

Lina Glushko

Monterrey Β· Round of 32

36
63
36

Aug 21

L

Qinwen Zheng

Zhengzhou Β· Round of 32

46
36

Oct 11

L

Yulia Putintseva

Budapest Β· Round of 32

61
26
16

Jul 19

L

Weronika Falkowska

Gdynia Β· Round of 32

06
26

Jul 21

W

Yafan Wang

Abu Dhabi Β· Round of 64

63
36
75

Jan 8

L

Ons Jabeur

Abu Dhabi Β· Round of 32

75
36

Jan 8

L

Clara Burel

Strasbourg Β· Round of 32

63
16
46

Sep 23

L

Danka Kovinic

Istanbul Β· Round of 32

57
26

Sep 9

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ WatsonWatson ahead↓ Bondarenko

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 26–26 matches

MetricWatsonBondarenko
Matches won54%-
Sets won53%-
Games won52%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageWatsonBondarenko
WTA 50001
WTA 25030

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceWatsonBondarenko
Hard20
Clay11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Heather Watson vs Kateryna Bondarenko FAQ

Heather Watson leads the head-to-head 3–1 over 4 meetings.