Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Haoyuan Huang vs John Hallquist LithenPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Haoyuan Huang and John Hallquist Lithen have met 1 time since 2025; John Hallquist Lithen leads 1–0. Across all meetings Huang has taken 0 sets to Lithen's 2. Their most recent meeting: John Hallquist Lithen won at M15 Monastir 35 (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorHuangHallquist Lithen
Wins in straight sets100%80%
Wins a set when losing17%26%
Goes to a deciding set13%22%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite50%58%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog33%41%
Tiebreak sets won40%57%
Wins after taking set 1100%85%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%79%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample β€” read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Huang 0, Hallquist Lithen 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Huang

πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Lithen

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

The βš”οΈ The Gladiator archetype wins about 54% vs πŸ›‘οΈ The Spoiler across 288 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward John Hallquist Lithen.

The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Sep 17, 2025

M15 Monastir 35

H Hard Β· 1st Round

57
26
Lithen

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricHuangLithen
W-L-16–11
Avg odds-1.86
ROI %--18.7%
Units P/L--5.04u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricHuangLithen
Countriesβ€”4
Eventsβ€”5
Matchesβ€”17
Distanceβ€”β€”
Routeβ€”AUT β†’ SVK β†’ SWE β†’ HUN

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Lithen has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Huang's 0%).

OpponentHuangLithen
Ezekiel Clark
L
36
64
36
W
62
64

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Huang
LLLLLLWW
L

Julien De Cuyper

M15 Maanshan 4 Β· 1st Round

36
677

Mar 25

L

Kai I Wang

M15 Maanshan Β· Round of 32

36
6377

Mar 4

L

Kai-I Wang

M15 Maanshan 1 Β· 1st Round

36
637

Mar 4

L

Jorge Plans

M15 Monastir Β· Round of 32

16
14

Sep 24

L

John Hallquist Lithen

M15 Monastir 35 Β· 1st Round

57
26

Sep 17

L

Ezekiel Clark

M15 Monastir 34 Β· 2nd Round

36
64
36

Sep 11

W

Jack Patrick Mcgary

M15 Monastir 34 Β· 1st Round

762
63

Sep 10

W

Jack Mcgary

M15 Monastir Β· Round of 32

7762
63

Sep 10

Lithen
LWWWWLWW
L

Ignacio Monzon

M15 Pecs Β· Semifinals

57
63
16

Aug 29

W

Trisztan Gubi

M15 Pecs Β· Quarterfinals

63
63

Aug 28

W

Bercel Sandor Takacs

M15 Pecs Β· 2nd Round

62
26
61

Aug 27

W

Bercel Sandor Takacs

M15 Pecs Β· 2nd Round

62
26
61

Aug 27

W

Peter Sallay

M15 Pecs Β· 1st Round

26
60
63

Aug 26

L

Leo Borg

M15 Bastad Β· Semifinals

36
57

Aug 22

W

Davide Tortora

M15 Bastad Β· Quarterfinals

61
62

Aug 21

W

Oskar Jansson

M15 Bastad Β· 1st Round

60
62

Aug 20

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 8–85 matches

MetricHuangLithen
Matches won25%60%
Sets won29%59%
Games won44%55%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageHuangLithen
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceHuangLithen
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Haoyuan Huang vs John Hallquist Lithen FAQ

John Hallquist Lithen leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.