Gina Monteleone vs Katja WiersholmPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Gina Monteleone and Katja Wiersholm have met 1 time since 2026; Katja Wiersholm leads 1–0. Across all meetings Monteleone has taken 0 sets to Wiersholm's 2. Their most recent meeting: Katja Wiersholm won at Nottingham 3 ITF (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Monteleone | Wiersholm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Gina Monteleone | Katja Wiersholm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 92% | 11/12 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 14% | 1/7 | 8% | 1/12 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 14% | 1/7 | 8% | 2/24 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 80% | 4/5 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/6 | 22% | 2/9 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 0% | 0/1 | 50% | 2/4 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 100% | 11/11 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 100% | 11/11 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Monteleone 0, Wiersholm 1).
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 13, 2026
Nottingham 3 ITF
H Hard
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Monteleone | Wiersholm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 4.96 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Monteleone | Wiersholm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | — | USA → GER |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Katja Wiersholm
Nottingham 3 ITF
Jul 13
Franziska Sziedat
Kayseri 7 ITF · Round of 32
Jun 30
Jana Hossam Salah
Kayseri 6 ITF · Round of 32
Jun 24
Kamila Kashaeva
Klosters ITF
Jun 14
Angelina Wirges
Hurghada 7 ITF · Round of 32
Jun 9
Micol Salvadori
Monastir 38 ITF · Round of 32
Jun 3
Natalia Sousa Salazar
Monastir 37 ITF · Round of 32
May 26
Elena Korokozidi
W50 Heraklion · 1st Round
Oct 5
Berta Passola
W50 Berkeley · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 21
Naiktha Bains
W50 Nottingham · Quarterfinals
Jul 16
Leticia Romanova
W50 Nottingham · 2nd Round
Jul 15
Mingge Xu
W50 Nottingham · 1st Round
Jul 14
Giulia Alessia Monteleone
W50 Nottingham · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Gina Monteleone
Nottingham 3 ITF
Jul 13
Warona Mdlulwa
W50 Nottingham · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 7–24 matches
| Metric | Monteleone | Wiersholm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 50% |
| Sets won | 7% | 50% |
| Games won | 29% | 49% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Monteleone | Wiersholm |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Monteleone | Wiersholm |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.