Giles Hussey vs William ManningPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
π¬π§Giles Hussey
#290 Β· 29 yrs Β· L
9w41 meeting Β· sets 0β2
πΊπΈWilliam Manning
#1097 Β· 21 yrs Β· R
8wGiles Hussey and William Manning have met 1 time since 2026; William Manning leads 1β0. Across all meetings Hussey has taken 0 sets to Manning's 2. Their most recent meeting: William Manning won at Cary Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Hussey | Manning | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Giles Hussey | William Manning | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 73% | 33/45 | 63% | 5/8 |
| Wins a set when losing | 27% | 7/26 | 17% | 1/6 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 27% | 19/71 | 29% | 4/14 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 49% | 21/43 | 50% | 1/2 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 54% | 13/24 | 38% | 3/8 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 57% | 8/14 | 75% | 3/4 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 95% | 40/42 | 100% | 8/8 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 79% | 33/42 | 63% | 5/8 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hussey 0, Manning 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Hussey
π§± The Wall
Manning
π€ Servebot
Matchup analysis
The π€ Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs π§± The Wall across 386 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward William Manning.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the wall's elite returner.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 29, 2026
Cary Challenger
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days
| Outcome | Hussey | Manning | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Giles Hussey | William Manning | ||
| 1 or more | 70% | 7/10 | 86% | 6/7 |
| 3 or more | 20% | 2/10 | 86% | 6/7 |
| 5 or more | 10% | 1/10 | 71% | 5/7 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 29% | 2/7 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 29% | 2/7 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 0% | 0/7 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Hussey | Manning |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4β4 | 5β5 |
| Avg odds | 2.10 | 2.70 |
| ROI % | +4.5% | +22.3% |
| Units P/L | +0.36u | +2.23u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months
Hussey has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Manning's 0%).
| Opponent | Hussey | Manning |
|---|---|---|
| Edward Winter | W 63 63 | L 36 46 |
| Enzo Aguiard | W 64 76 | L 46 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
William Manning
Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 29
Quentin Halys
Lexus Eastbourne Open - Eastbourne Β· 2nd Round
Jun 24
Matteo Arnaldi
Lexus Eastbourne Open - Eastbourne Β· 1st Round
Jun 23
Luca Nardi
Lexus Nottingham Open Β· 2nd Round Qualifying
Jun 14
Patrick Brady
Lexus Nottingham Open Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 13
Philip Henning
Centurion 2 Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jun 5
Robin Bertrand
Centurion 2 Challenger Β· 2nd Round
Jun 4
Mukund Sasikumar
Centurion 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 2
Gavin Young
M25 Dallas Β· 2nd Round
Jul 9
Gavin Young
Futures 2026
Jul 9
Jonah Braswell
M25 Dallas Β· 1st Round
Jul 8
Edward Winter
Cary Challenger Β· Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Giles Hussey
Cary Challenger Β· 1st Round
Jun 29
Braden Shick
M25 Tulsa Β· 1st Round
Jun 17
Ezekiel Clark
Futures 2026
Jun 16
Mikael Arseneault
Futures 2026
Jun 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 14β71 matches
| Metric | Hussey | Manning |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 63% | 57% |
| Sets won | 60% | 53% |
| Games won | 53% | 53% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Hussey | Manning |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Hussey | Manning |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.