Gijs Brouwer vs Nathaniel LammonsPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Gijs Brouwer and Nathaniel Lammons have met 1 time since 2021; Gijs Brouwer leads 1–0. Across all meetings Brouwer has taken 2 sets to Lammons's 0. Their most recent meeting: Gijs Brouwer won at Charlottesville (2021).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Brouwer | Lammons | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Gijs Brouwer | Nathaniel Lammons | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 43% | 3/7 | 0% | 0/1 |
| Wins a set when losing | 40% | 4/10 | 0% | 0/1 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 47% | 8/17 | 50% | 1/2 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 25% | 1/4 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 60% | 6/10 | 50% | 1/2 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 50% | 1/2 | 0% | 0/1 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 60% | 6/10 | 100% | 1/1 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 30% | 3/10 | 0% | 0/1 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Brouwer 1, Lammons 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Brouwer
⚙️ Grinder
Lammons
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,470 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Nathaniel Lammons.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Oct 31, 2021
Charlottesville
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Brouwer | Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 3.06 | - |
| ROI % | +17.2% | - |
| Units P/L | +1.03u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Brouwer | Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 4 | — |
| Distance | 6,189 mi · 9,961 km | — |
| Route | TUR → JAM | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Andres Martin
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Lucas Poullain
Istanbul Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 8
Koki Matsuda
Istanbul Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Manas Dhamne
Istanbul Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 4
Tsung-Hao Huang
Bunschoten challenger
Jul 12
Daniel Michalski
Plovdiv Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 22
Manas Dhamne
Shymkent 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Apr 29
Ivan Gakhov
Shymkent 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Apr 27
Adrian Boitan
Moldova Open · 1st Round Qualifying
May 24
Stefan Latinovic
Moldova Open · 2nd Round Qualifying
May 3
Gijs Brouwer
Charlottesville · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 31
Mats Rosenkranz
Mouilleron le Captif · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 3
Nicola Kuhn
Szczecin · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Borna Gojo
Nottingham · 1st Round Qualifying
Jun 7
Denis Istomin
Cherbourg · Round of 32
Feb 10
Denis Istomin
Cherbourg Challenger · 1st Round
Feb 10
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 2–17 matches
| Metric | Brouwer | Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 41% | 50% |
| Sets won | 43% | 40% |
| Games won | 44% | 49% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Brouwer | Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Brouwer | Lammons |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.