Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Gian Luca Tanner vs Melih AnavatanPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Gian Luca Tanner and Melih Anavatan have met 2 times since 2026; they are level 1–1. Their first meeting came at M15 Pretoria in 2026 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1–1. Across all meetings Tanner has taken 3 sets to Anavatan's 2. Their most recent meeting: Gian Luca Tanner won at M15 Pretoria (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorLuca TannerAnavatan
Wins in straight sets67%73%
Wins a set when losing27%30%
Goes to a deciding set31%28%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite40%71%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog75%50%
Tiebreak sets won14%47%
Wins after taking set 187%96%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 180%83%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Luca Tanner 1, Anavatan 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Tanner

⚔️ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Anavatan

🧱 The Wall

Elite returnerLow unforced errorsExtreme consistencyPhysical endurance

Matchup analysis

⚔️ The Gladiator vs 🧱 The Wall is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 383 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Apr 25, 2026

M15 Pretoria

H Hard · Quarterfinals

62
64
Tanner

Apr 15, 2026

M15 Pretoria

H Hard · 1st Round

26
61
667
Anavatan

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days

OutcomeTannerAnavatan
1 or more50%33%
3 or more0%0%
5 or more0%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricTannerAnavatan
W-L1–22–4
Avg odds1.993.80
ROI %-65.2%+29.2%
Units P/L-1.96u+1.75u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Tanner has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Anavatan's 50%).

OpponentTannerAnavatan
Rocco Piatti
W
67
64
63
L
67
62
36
Jayden Summers
W
60
61
W
61
60
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
W
26
61
62
L
67
36
Mikail Alimli
W
63
64
W
75
16
76

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Tanner
LLLWLLWW
L

David Eichenseher

M15 Pontevedra · 1st Round

36
06

Oct 6

L

Finn Murgett

M25 Sintra · 1st Round

06
36

Sep 16

L

Miguel Semedo

M25 Sintra · 2nd Round

26
16

Sep 10

W

Diogo Coelho

M25 Sintra · 1st Round

63
62

Sep 9

L

Dimitris Sakellaridis

Sion Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

26
16

Aug 16

L

Jesse Flores

M15 Pretoria · Semifinals

46
26

Apr 26

W

Melih Anavatan

M15 Pretoria · Quarterfinals

62
64

Apr 25

W

Rocco Piatti

M15 Pretoria · 2nd Round

657
64
63

Apr 23

Anavatan
LWLLLWLW
L

Liam Branger

M15 Monastir · 2nd Round

46
26

Oct 1

W

Mae Malige

M15 Monastir · 1st Round

75
75

Sep 29

L

Ewen Lumsden

M15 Monastir · 1st Round

57
63
46

Sep 23

L

Digvijaypratap Singh

Istanbul Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

36
75
627

Aug 2

L

Kenta Miyoshi

Samsun Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

26
26

Jul 27

W

Hunter Heck

Samsun Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

46
64
63

Jul 26

L

Mert Naci Turker

M15 Kayseri · Quarterfinals

36
36

Jul 3

W

Bora Sengul

M15 Kayseri · 2nd Round

62
62

Jul 2

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ Tannerlevel↓ Anavatan

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 29–53 matches

MetricTannerAnavatan
Matches won62%49%
Sets won58%50%
Games won55%51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageTannerAnavatan
ITF M1511

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceTannerAnavatan
Hard11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Gian Luca Tanner vs Melih Anavatan FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1–1 over 2 meetings.