Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Fiona Ganz vs Lea NilssonPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Fiona Ganz and Lea Nilsson have met 1 time since 2026; Lea Nilsson leads 1–0. Across all meetings Ganz has taken 1 sets to Nilsson's 2. Their most recent meeting: Lea Nilsson won at W50 Horb (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorGanzNilsson
Wins in straight sets58%83%
Wins a set when losing40%50%
Goes to a deciding set41%30%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite53%58%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog56%75%
Tiebreak sets won71%70%
Wins after taking set 180%81%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 155%70%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ganz 0, Nilsson 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Ganz

🏹 Frontrunner

Fast startsAggressive openersMomentum-drivenStrong holds
vs

Nilsson

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 61% vs βš”οΈ The Gladiator across 533 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Fiona Ganz.

Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 22, 2026

W50 Horb

C Clay Β· 1st Round

36
63
26
Nilsson

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricGanzNilsson
W-L0–19–4
Avg odds4.421.68
ROI %-100.0%+2.5%
Units P/L-1.00u+0.32u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricGanzNilsson
Countriesβ€”2
Eventsβ€”2
Matchesβ€”2
Distanceβ€”β€”
Routeβ€”POR β†’ DEN

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Nilsson has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Ganz's 33%).

OpponentGanzNilsson
Selena Janicijevic
L
26
64
46
L
36
60
36
Golsa Rahimian Amiri
W
60
62
W
63
62
Victoria Pohle
L
57
57
W
60
61

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Ganz
LLLLLWLW
L

Lea Nilsson

W50 Horb Β· 1st Round

36
63
26

Jul 22

L

Anna Kubareva

W15 Monastir Β· 1st Round

06
16

Apr 8

L

Yuliya Hatouka

W15 Monastir 8 Β· 1st Round

63
36
16

Apr 2

L

Ariana Arseneault

W35 The Hague 1 Β· 1st Round

36
46

Feb 16

L

Francesca Gandolfi

W15 Antalya 3 Β· 2nd Round

765
36
16

Feb 5

W

Nanari Katsumi

W15 Antalya 3 Β· 1st Round

63
06
64

Feb 4

L

Beatrice Ricci

W15 Antalya 2 Β· Semifinals

64
36
16

Jan 31

W

Daria Lodikova

W15 Antalya 2 Β· Quarterfinals

63
657
64

Jan 31

Nilsson
LLWWWWWL
L

Selena Janicijevic

W50 Kursumlijska Banja Β· 1st Round

36
60
36

Aug 26

L

Darya Astakhova

W75 Kursumlijska Banja Β· 1st Round

36
16

Aug 19

W

Dayeon Back

W50 Horb Β· Final

763
62

Jul 26

W

Charo Esquiva Banuls

W50 Horb Β· Semifinals

63
75

Jul 25

W

Francesca Parcelli

W50 Horb Β· Quarterfinals

63
62

Jul 24

W

Margaux Rouvroy

W50 Horb Β· 2nd Round

63
26
61

Jul 23

W

Fiona Ganz

W50 Horb Β· 1st Round

63
36
62

Jul 22

L

Alicia Herrero Linana

W50 Darmstadt Β· 1st Round

16
26

Jul 15

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 34–37 matches

MetricGanzNilsson
Matches won56%62%
Sets won54%62%
Games won50%54%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageGanzNilsson
ITF W5001

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceGanzNilsson
Clay01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Fiona Ganz vs Lea Nilsson FAQ

Lea Nilsson leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.