Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Fiona Crawley vs Louisa ChiricoPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Fiona Crawley and Louisa Chirico have met 1 time since 2025; Fiona Crawley leads 1–0. Across all meetings Crawley has taken 2 sets to Chirico's 1. Their most recent meeting: Fiona Crawley won at W75 Toronto 1 (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorCrawleyChirico
Wins in straight sets52%75%
Wins a set when losing33%40%
Goes to a deciding set43%33%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite45%56%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog65%44%
Tiebreak sets won73%50%
Wins after taking set 195%80%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 164%60%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Crawley 0, Chirico 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Crawley

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Chirico

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

Both Fiona Crawley and Louisa Chirico are πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 14,668 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Oct 31, 2025

W75 Toronto 1

H Hard Β· Quarterfinals

64
36
64
Crawley

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricCrawleyChirico
W-L9–4-
Avg odds1.99-
ROI %+27.3%-
Units P/L+3.55u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricCrawleyChirico
Countries3β€”
Events3β€”
Matches6β€”
Distanceβ€”β€”
RouteCZE β†’ POL β†’ ESPβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Crawley has a higher win rate against shared opponents (33% vs Chirico's 0%).

OpponentCrawleyChirico
Kayla Day
W
61
62
L
36
16
Mary Stoiana
L
26
16
L
67
36
Emina Bektas
L
26
16
L
16
75
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Crawley
LWWLWLWW
L

Julia Grabher

Philly Open - Philadelphia Β· Quarterfinals

46
36

Aug 27

W

Ekaterina Ovcharenko

Philly Open - Philadelphia Β· 2nd Round

64
63

Aug 26

W

Simona Waltert

Philly Open - Philadelphia Β· 1st Round

75
63

Aug 24

L

Anastasia Zakharova

W100 Landisville Β· 2nd Round

46
46

Aug 7

W

Lizette Cabrera

W100 Landisville Β· 1st Round

61
762

Aug 5

L

Ayana Akli

W75 Lexington Β· Semifinals

36
36

Aug 1

W

Eunhye Lee

W75 Lexington Β· Quarterfinals

761
63

Jul 31

W

Lexington Reed

W75 Lexington Β· 2nd Round

667
62
760

Jul 30

Chirico
LLWLWWLW
L

Hanyu Guo

Dow Tennis Classic - Midland Β· 1st Round

63
46
26

Feb 17

L

Kayla Day

W50 Orlando 1 Β· 2nd Round

36
16

Feb 5

W

Carolina Alves

W50 Orlando 1 Β· 1st Round

75
63

Feb 3

L

Elvina Kalieva

W100 San Diego 1 Β· Quarterfinals

677
36

Jan 30

W

Ella Mcdonald

W100 San Diego 1 Β· 2nd Round

64
46
64

Jan 29

W

Anastasia Abbagnato

W100 San Diego 1 Β· 1st Round

64
764

Jan 27

L

Varvara Lepchenko

Austin 125 - Austin Β· 2nd Round

26
46

Nov 5

W

Petra Marcinko

Austin 125 - Austin Β· 1st Round

64
64

Nov 3

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 18–42 matches

MetricCrawleyChirico
Matches won64%44%
Sets won58%48%
Games won52%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageCrawleyChirico
ITF W7510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceCrawleyChirico
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Fiona Crawley vs Louisa Chirico FAQ

Fiona Crawley leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.