Federico Iannaccone vs Yanaki MilevPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- San Gregorio di Catania Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- 3rd Round Qualifying
- Surface
- Clay
- Date & time
- October 12 ยท 5:30 AM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
At 1.83 or shorter, Yanaki Milev has won 8 of 20 (40%). The price implied 58%, so Yanaki Milev has fallen 18 points short of it.
At 1.88 or longer, Federico Iannaccone has won 16 of 40 (40%). That is level with the 42% the price implied.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Federico Iannaccone and Yanaki Milev meet in the 3rd Round Qualifying of the San Gregorio di Catania Challenger on October 12 on clay. The two are separated by 32 ranking spots, with Iannaccone at 587 and Milev at 619, but Milev has built considerably stronger form heading into the match.
The pair have no prior head-to-head record. Recent results against common opponents paint a split picture: Iannaccone defeated Dusan Obradovic while Milev fell to him, yet Milev beat both Petr Nesterov and Valerio Aboian in matches Iannaccone lost. Over his last five matches, Iannaccone has won two; Milev has won four. Milev has played seven matches in the past 14 days and holds a 70% win rate on clay in the sample period, compared to Iannaccone's 55%.
Iannaccone relies on aggression and physicality to dictate points from the baseline. Milev constructs rallies with precision and patience, thriving when he can neutralize pace and redirect play. On clay, Milev's recent consistency suggests comfort with the extended baseline exchanges the surface demands. For Iannaccone, maintaining rhythm and controlling the pace of the match will be essential against a player built to absorb and reset.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months
| Indicator | Iannaccone | Milev | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Federico Iannaccone | Yanaki Milev | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 82% | 31/38 | 55% | 18/33 |
| Wins a set when losing | 39% | 11/28 | 36% | 10/28 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 27% | 18/66 | 41% | 25/61 |
| Covers โ1.5 sets as favorite | 51% | 18/35 | 30% | 7/23 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 79% | 19/24 | 71% | 20/28 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 69% | 9/13 | 36% | 5/14 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 84% | 32/38 | 85% | 28/33 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 82% | 31/38 | 55% | 18/33 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Iannaccone
โ๏ธ The Gladiator
Milev
๐ช Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The ๐ช Counterpuncher archetype wins about 53% vs โ๏ธ The Gladiator across 2,464 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Yanaki Milev.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Iannaccone and Milev have never faced each other on tour.
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets ยท Last 90 days
| Outcome | Iannaccone | Milev | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Federico Iannaccone | Yanaki Milev | ||
| 1 or more | 77% | 13/17 | 75% | 18/24 |
| 3 or more | 24% | 4/17 | 33% | 8/24 |
| 5 or more | 12% | 2/17 | 8% | 2/24 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/17 | 0% | 0/24 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/17 | 0% | 0/24 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/17 | 0% | 0/24 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days
| Metric | Iannaccone | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11โ7 | 16โ7 |
| Avg odds | 1.96 | 2.27 |
| ROI % | +7.6% | +47.6% |
| Units P/L | +1.36u | +10.95u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Iannaccone | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 2 | 1 |
| Matches | 3 | 3 |
| Distance | 462 mi ยท 744 km | 0 mi ยท 0 km |
| Route | ITA | BUL |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months
Milev has a higher win rate against shared opponents (80% vs Iannaccone's 60%).
| Opponent | Iannaccone | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Simone Consolo | W 60 61 | W 75 60 |
| Luca Wiedenmann | W 63 64 | W 62 61 |
| Valerio Aboian | L 46 16 | W 64 57 62 |
| Petr Nesterov | L 60 57 46 | W 76 36 64 |
| Dusan Obradovic | W 76 76 | L 36 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Simone Consolo
San Gregorio di Catania Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Giovanni Oradini
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula ยท 2nd Round
Oct 8
Lorenzo Carboni
M25 Santa Margherita di Pula ยท 1st Round
Oct 7
Federico Arnaboldi
Bari Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 27
Luka Mikrut
Genoa 2 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Sep 22
Maximo Zeitune
Genoa 2 Challenger ยท 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 21
Tomaso Calla
Genoa 2 Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 20
Giuseppe La Vela
Biella Challenger ยท 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Maxime Chazal
San Gregorio di Catania Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Francesco Passaro
Palermo Challenger ยท Semifinals
Oct 10
Carlos Sanchez Jover
Palermo Challenger ยท Quarterfinals
Oct 9
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Palermo Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Oct 8
Ivan Gakhov
Palermo Challenger ยท 1st Round
Oct 6
Daniel Siniakov
Palermo Challenger ยท 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
Palermo Challenger ยท 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 4
Tommaso Compagnucci
Plovdiv 4 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Sep 22
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 61โ66 matches
| Metric | Iannaccone | Milev |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 58% | 54% |
| Sets won | 58% | 52% |
| Games won | 54% | 51% |