Eunchae Kim vs Xiao TangPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Eunchae Kim and Xiao Tang have met 1 time since 2026; Eunchae Kim leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kim has taken 2 sets to Tang's 0. Their most recent meeting: Eunchae Kim won at W15 Tianjin (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kim | Tang | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Eunchae Kim | Xiao Tang | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 75% | 18/24 | 91% | 10/11 |
| Wins a set when losing | 29% | 4/14 | 40% | 4/10 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 26% | 10/38 | 24% | 5/21 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 5/10 | 67% | 2/3 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 54% | 7/13 | 57% | 4/7 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 40% | 2/5 | 0% | 0/3 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 96% | 24/25 | 83% | 10/12 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 72% | 18/25 | 83% | 10/12 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kim 1, Tang 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kim
⚙️ Grinder
Tang
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 68% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,247 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Xiao Tang.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Aug 23, 2026
W15 Tianjin
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Kim | Tang | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Eunchae Kim | Xiao Tang | ||
| 1 or more | 56% | 5/9 | 71% | 5/7 |
| 3 or more | 11% | 1/9 | 29% | 2/7 |
| 5 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/7 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/7 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 5–5 | 4–3 |
| Avg odds | 1.99 | 2.99 |
| ROI % | -19.9% | +23.1% |
| Units P/L | -1.99u | +1.62u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | 3 |
| Events | 2 | 3 |
| Matches | 2 | 9 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | POR → COL | POL → POR → COL |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Tang has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Kim's 0%).
| Opponent | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Player | L 06 06 | W 64 63 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Unknown Player
W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Hajar Crinebouch
W35 Villeneuve d'Ascq · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 4
Alexandra Biot
W35 Reims · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Mutsumi Uemura
W35 Kyoto · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Hyunyee Lee
W15 Yeongwol · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 6
Ayano Shimizu
W15 Tianjin · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Mengxi Sun
W15 Tianjin · 2nd Round Qualifying
Aug 24
Xiao Tang
W15 Tianjin · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 23
Jiaqi Wang
W15 Maanshan · 2nd Round
Oct 8
Albina Kakenova
W15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Oct 7
Unknown Player
W15 Maanshan · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Junlu Sun
W15 Maanshan · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Ekaterina Kuznetsova
W15 Maanshan · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 29
Jiaqi Yang
W15 Maanshan · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Yuhan Wang
W15 Maanshan · 2nd Round
Sep 24
Polina Leykina
W15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Sep 23
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 21–38 matches
| Metric | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 63% | 52% |
| Sets won | 60% | 55% |
| Games won | 55% | 55% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W15 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.