Eri Shimizu vs Janani RameshPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Eri Shimizu and Janani Ramesh have met 1 time since 2026; Eri Shimizu leads 1–0. Across all meetings Shimizu has taken 2 sets to Ramesh's 0. Their most recent meeting: Eri Shimizu won at W100 Bengaluru 1 (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Shimizu | Ramesh | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Eri Shimizu | Janani Ramesh | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 66% | 19/29 | 67% | 2/3 |
| Wins a set when losing | 27% | 6/22 | 0% | 0/3 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 31% | 16/51 | 17% | 1/6 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 59% | 16/27 | 100% | 1/1 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 45% | 9/20 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 33% | 3/9 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 92% | 22/24 | 100% | 3/3 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 79% | 19/24 | 67% | 2/3 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Shimizu 1, Ramesh 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Shimizu
🎯 Baseliner
Ramesh
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🎯 Baseliner across 269 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Janani Ramesh.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Feb 15, 2026
W100 Bengaluru 1
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Shimizu | Ramesh |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 4–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.92 | - |
| ROI % | -11.0% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.77u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Shimizu | Ramesh |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 6 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | ESP → AUT | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Hiromi Abe
W50 Nanao · Quarterfinals
Sep 25
Nana Onozawa
W50 Nanao · 2nd Round
Sep 24
Chia Yi Tsao
W50 Nanao · 1st Round
Sep 23
Jia Jing Lu
W35 Kyoto · Quarterfinals
Sep 18
Jiangxue Han
W35 Kyoto · 2nd Round
Sep 17
Michika Ozeki
W35 Kyoto · 1st Round
Sep 16
Sijia Wei
W50 Guiyang · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 7
Patcharin Cheapchadej
W50 Guiyang · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 6
Danica Fernando
W15 Nagpur 1 · 3rd Round Qualifying
Mar 23
Arunkumar Lakshmi Prabha
W15 Nagpur 1 · 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 22
Thasaporn Naklo
W15 Gurugram 1 · 1st Round
Feb 25
Danica Fernando
W15 Gurugram 1 · 3rd Round Qualifying
Feb 23
Jeetesh Kumari
W15 Gurugram 1 · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 22
Eri Shimizu
W100 Bengaluru 1 · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 15
Suzuna Oigawa
W15 Phan Thiet 2 · 1st Round
Nov 19
Vlada Mincheva
W15 Gurugram 2 · 1st Round
Sep 24
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 6–53 matches
| Metric | Shimizu | Ramesh |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 58% | 50% |
| Sets won | 54% | 46% |
| Games won | 52% | 45% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Shimizu | Ramesh |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W100 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Shimizu | Ramesh |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.