Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Dusan Lajovic vs Mischa ZverevPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Dusan Lajovic and Mischa Zverev have met 2 times since 2015; they are level 1–1. Their first meeting came at Nottingham in 2015 on grass. Across all meetings Lajovic has taken 2 sets to Zverev's 2. Their most recent meeting: Dusan Lajovic won at Kitzbuhel (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorLajovicZverev
Wins in straight sets67%—
Wins a set when losing37%—
Goes to a deciding set35%—
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite48%—
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog68%—
Tiebreak sets won52%—
Wins after taking set 184%—
Wins 2-0 after taking set 165%—

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Lajovic 1, Zverev 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Lajovic

🎯 Baseliner

Precise groundstrokesCourt controlPatient constructionConsistent depth
vs

Zverev

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 54% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 979 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Dusan Lajovic.

Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Feb 12, 2025

Kitzbuhel

C Clay · Round of 16

64
64
Lajovic

Jun 2, 2015

Nottingham

G Grass · 1st Round Qualifying

26
6277
Zverev

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricLajovicZverev
W-L10–5-
Avg odds1.87-
ROI %+16.8%-
Units P/L+2.51u-

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricLajovicZverev
Countries1—
Events1—
Matches1—
Distance0 mi · 0 km—
RoutePOL—

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Lajovic
LLWWWWLW
L

Diego Dedura

Szczecin Challenger · 1st Round

Sep 15

L

Facundo Diaz Acosta

Seville Challenger · Final

26
16

Sep 13

W

Max Alcala Gurri

Seville Challenger · Semifinals

Sep 12

W

Henrique Rocha

Seville Challenger · Quarterfinals

64
64

Sep 11

W

Calvin Hemery

Seville Challenger · 2nd Round

64
62

Sep 10

W

Martin Landaluce

Seville Challenger · 1st Round

60
64

Sep 8

L

Chak Pong Marco Lam

U.S. Open - New York · 3rd Round Qualifying

46
36

Aug 27

W

David Jorda Sanchis

U.S. Open - New York · 2nd Round Qualifying

75
762

Aug 26

Zverev
LLLWLLLL
L

Dusan Lajovic

Kitzbuhel · Round of 16

46
46

Feb 12

L

Titouan Droguet

Sanremo · 1st Round Qualifying

36
26

Apr 3

L

Christopher Heyman

Eckental · 2nd Round Qualifying

36
63
26

Nov 1

W

Alen Mujakic

Eckental · 1st Round Qualifying

62
61

Oct 31

L

Julian Lenz

Ismaning · 2nd Round Qualifying

57
6277

Oct 25

L

Frederico Ferreira Silva

Alicante Challenger · 2nd Round

26
06

Oct 14

L

Vladyslav Orlov

Alicante Challenger · 1st Round

62
61

Oct 11

L

Jurgen Briand

Mouilleron le Captif · 1st Round Qualifying

36
36

Oct 3

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ Lajoviclevel↓ Zverev

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 59–59 matches

MetricLajovicZverev
Matches won51%-
Sets won51%-
Games won50%-

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageLajovicZverev
ATP 25011

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceLajovicZverev
Clay10
Grass01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Dusan Lajovic vs Mischa Zverev FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1–1 over 2 meetings.