Dong Ju Kim vs Sheng TangPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Dong Ju Kim and Sheng Tang have met 1 time since 2026; Dong Ju Kim leads 1–0. Across all meetings Kim has taken 2 sets to Tang's 0. Their most recent meeting: Dong Ju Kim won at M15 Maanshan (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Ju Kim | Tang | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Dong Ju Kim | Sheng Tang | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 84% | 27/32 | 88% | 7/8 |
| Wins a set when losing | 35% | 8/23 | 50% | 5/10 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 24% | 13/55 | 33% | 6/18 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 7/14 | 67% | 2/3 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 75% | 9/12 | 75% | 6/8 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 73% | 11/15 | 33% | 1/3 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 85% | 29/34 | 78% | 7/9 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 79% | 27/34 | 78% | 7/9 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ju Kim 1, Tang 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kim
⚔️ The Gladiator
Tang
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
⚔️ The Gladiator vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 646 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 11, 2026
M15 Maanshan
H Hard · 2nd Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Kim | Tang | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Dong Ju Kim | Sheng Tang | ||
| 1 or more | 67% | 6/9 | 100% | 4/4 |
| 3 or more | 33% | 3/9 | 25% | 1/4 |
| 5 or more | 22% | 2/9 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/4 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/9 | 0% | 0/4 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–2 | 5–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.74 | 1.94 |
| ROI % | -37.2% | +32.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.49u | +2.26u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 3 | — |
| Matches | 3 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | CHN | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Kim and Tang posted a 100% win rate.
| Opponent | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Ryo Minakata | W 64 76 | W 62 62 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Fumin Jiang
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Aug 26
Ku Keon Kang
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Aug 19
Eito Komada
M15 Tianjin · 1st Round
Aug 4
Max Purcell
M15 Wuning · Quarterfinals
Jun 26
Yua Taka
M15 Wuning · 2nd Round
Jun 25
Ryo Minakata
M15 Wuning · 1st Round
Jun 24
Moerani Bouzige
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Jun 17
Matthew Dellavedova
M15 Maanshan · Quarterfinals
Jun 12
Xing Dao Chen
M15 Wuning · 1st Round
Jul 8
Xianfeng Chen
Futures 2026
Jul 8
Azuma Visaya
Futures 2026
Jul 7
Jun Hao Luo
Futures 2026
Jul 6
Saveliy Ivanov
Futures 2026
Jul 5
Jacob Kailiang Shen
Futures 2026
Jun 28
Siwanat Auytayakul
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Jun 17
Thantub Suksumrarn
Futures 2026
Jun 16
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 18–55 matches
| Metric | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 58% | 44% |
| Sets won | 59% | 50% |
| Games won | 53% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M15 | 1 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kim | Tang |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.