Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Dong Ju Kim vs San Hui SinPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Dong Ju Kim and San Hui Sin have met 2 times since 2026; they are level 1–1. Their first meeting came at M15 Nishi-Tokyo in 2026 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1–1. Across all meetings Kim has taken 3 sets to Sin's 2. Their most recent meeting: Dong Ju Kim won at M15 Gimcheon (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorJu KimHui Sin
Wins in straight sets83%86%
Wins a set when losing40%20%
Goes to a deciding set27%16%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite50%0%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog73%0%
Tiebreak sets won70%—
Wins after taking set 184%100%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 178%92%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ju Kim 1, Hui Sin 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Kim

⚔️ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter
vs

Sin

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 53% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 2,464 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward San Hui Sin.

Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

May 30, 2026

M15 Gimcheon

H Hard · Semifinals

63
75
Kim

Mar 18, 2026

M15 Nishi-Tokyo

H Hard · Round of 32

36
64
36
Sin

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricKimSin
W-L4–3-
Avg odds1.67-
ROI %-12.3%-
Units P/L-0.86u-

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Sin has a higher win rate against shared opponents (80% vs Kim's 40%).

OpponentKimSin
Ku Keon Kang
L
36
36
W
61
64
Yeonsu Jeong
W
64
61
W
62
61
Naoki Tajima
L
36
64
26
W
62
64
Kazuma Kawachi
W
62
63
W
62
63
Yunseok Jang
L
46
67
W
62
61
Keisuke Saitoh
W
62
76
L
36
62
46
Yun seong Chung
L
57
16
W
63
10
Seokhyeon Chu
W
60
76
W
64
64
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
L
75
36
26
L
36
26
Kokoro Isomura
L
46
36
W
60
64

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Kim
LWLWLWLW
L

Yan Cheng Chen

M25 Luan · 2nd Round

Oct 8

W

Kuan-Yi Lee

M25 Luan · 1st Round

63
64

Oct 7

L

Kosuke Ogura

M15 Luan · 2nd Round

64
26
627

Oct 1

W

Xing Dao Chen

M15 Luan · 1st Round

760
60

Sep 30

L

Martin Borisiouk

Phan Thiet 4 Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

46
36

Sep 14

W

Quoc Cuong Tran

Phan Thiet 4 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

62
60

Sep 13

L

Grigoriy Lomakin

Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

46
62
657

Sep 7

W

Kristjan Tamm

Phan Thiet 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

36
63
767

Sep 6

Sin
LWWWWWWW
L

Dong Ju Kim

M15 Gimcheon · Semifinals

36
57

May 30

W

Yeonsu Jeong

M15 Gimcheon · Quarterfinals

62
61

May 29

W

Naoki Tajima

M15 Gimcheon · Round of 16

62
64

May 28

W

Kazuma Kawachi

M15 Gimcheon · Round of 32

62
63

May 27

W

Yunseok Jang

M15 Gimcheon · Final

62
61

May 24

W

Tai Leonard Sach

M15 Gimcheon · Semifinals

36
75
63

May 23

W

Yun Seong Chung

M15 Gimcheon · Quarterfinals

63
10

May 22

W

Sungbeen Sim

M15 Gimcheon · Round of 16

61
61

May 21

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ Kimlevel↓ Sin

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 19–60 matches

MetricKimSin
Matches won58%74%
Sets won59%71%
Games won53%59%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageKimSin
ITF M1511

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceKimSin
Hard11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Dong Ju Kim vs San Hui Sin FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1–1 over 2 meetings.