Dong Ju Kim vs Kristjan TammPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Phan Thiet 3 Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- 1st Round Qualifying
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- September 6 · 6:00 AM ET
Book odds
Dong Ju Kim and Kristjan Tamm meet in 1st Round Qualifying at the Phan Thiet 3 Challenger on hard court September 6. Kim ranks number 689; Tamm sits at number 1162. The two have never played each other.
Tamm has won 7 of his last 10 matches with a 60% win rate over five outings, while Kim has managed only 4 wins in ten matches and dropped three consecutive before an 11-day break. On hard court over a broader sample, both players sit at 55%, each with 11 wins and 9 losses.
Kim constructs points through baseline aggression and physical intensity. Kristjan Tamm builds his game around serve dominance. Kim will need to break serve consistently and avoid falling behind early in sets; Tamm must land his first serve at a high rate and shorten points before extended rallies develop where Kim's court coverage could take effect.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Ju Kim | Tamm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Dong Ju Kim | Kristjan Tamm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 84% | 26/31 | 57% | 8/14 |
| Wins a set when losing | 36% | 8/22 | 33% | 5/15 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 25% | 13/53 | 38% | 11/29 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 53% | 8/15 | 42% | 5/12 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 75% | 9/12 | 46% | 6/13 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 75% | 12/16 | 64% | 9/14 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 85% | 28/33 | 85% | 11/13 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 79% | 26/33 | 62% | 8/13 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kim
⚔️ The Gladiator
Tamm
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 57% vs ⚔️ The Gladiator across 1,037 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Kristjan Tamm.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
First career meeting
Kim and Tamm have never faced each other on tour.
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Kim | Tamm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Dong Ju Kim | Kristjan Tamm | ||
| 1 or more | 60% | 6/10 | 92% | 12/13 |
| 3 or more | 30% | 3/10 | 69% | 9/13 |
| 5 or more | 20% | 2/10 | 62% | 8/13 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 15% | 2/13 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 8% | 1/13 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/10 | 0% | 0/13 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kim | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–2 | 7–8 |
| Avg odds | 1.74 | 2.83 |
| ROI % | -37.2% | -9.9% |
| Units P/L | -1.49u | -1.48u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kim | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 3 |
| Events | 2 | 4 |
| Matches | 2 | 14 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | CHN | FIN → TPE → CHN |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kim has a higher win rate against shared opponents (67% vs Tamm's 50%).
| Opponent | Kim | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew Dellavedova | L 36 06 | L 46 26 |
| Kazuma Kawachi | W 62 63 | W 63 61 |
| Hugo Hashimoto | W 61 64 | W 76 63 |
| Oren Vasser | W 62 64 | W 61 36 63 |
| Braden Shick | L 16 36 | L 36 16 |
| Taisei Ichikawa | W 61 26 61 | L 67 36 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Fumin Jiang
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Aug 26
Ku Keon Kang
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Aug 19
Suk Ann
M15 Tianjin · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Eito Komada
M15 Tianjin · 1st Round
Aug 4
Max Purcell
M15 Wuning · Quarterfinals
Jun 26
Yua Taka
M15 Wuning · 2nd Round
Jun 25
Ryo Minakata
M15 Wuning · 1st Round
Jun 24
Moerani Bouzige
M15 Maanshan · 1st Round
Jun 17
Yuta Tomida
M15 Wuning · Quarterfinals
Sep 4
Zaharije-Zak Talic
M15 Wuning · 2nd Round
Sep 3
Reiya Komagata
M15 Wuning · 1st Round
Sep 2
Matthew Dellavedova
M25 Taipei · Quarterfinals
Aug 28
Arthur Weber
M25 Taipei · 2nd Round
Aug 27
Ren Nakamura
M25 Taipei · 1st Round
Aug 26
Noritaka Koizumi
M25 Taipei · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 25
Kazuma Kawachi
M25 Taipei · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 23
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 30–53 matches
| Metric | Kim | Tamm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 58% | 50% |
| Sets won | 59% | 49% |
| Games won | 53% | 49% |