Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

David Pichler vs Sascha Gueymard WayenburgPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

David Pichler and Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg have met 2 times since 2024; they are level 1โ€“1. Their first meeting came at Cassis in 2024 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1โ€“1. Across all meetings Pichler has taken 2 sets to Wayenburg's 2. Their most recent meeting: David Pichler won at Bratislava 2 Challenger (2025).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorPichlerGueymard Wayenburg
Wins in straight sets75%68%
Wins a set when losing0%32%
Goes to a deciding set11%32%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”43%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog44%50%
Tiebreak sets won50%43%
Wins after taking set 1100%85%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%65%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Pichler 1, Gueymard Wayenburg 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Pichler

โš™๏ธ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Wayenburg

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs โš™๏ธ Grinder across 1,211 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Oct 28, 2025

Bratislava 2 Challenger

H Hard ยท 1st Round

64
64
Pichler

Sep 1, 2024

Cassis

H Hard ยท 1st Round Qualifying

6477
26
Wayenburg

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricPichlerWayenburg
W-L-5โ€“7
Avg odds-2.63
ROI %--9.2%
Units P/L--1.10u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months

Across 3 shared opponents, both Pichler and Wayenburg posted a 67% win rate.

OpponentPichlerWayenburg
Arthur Reymond
W
62
64
W
62
63
Francesco Maestrelli
L
26
57
L
26
61
16
Matej Dodig
W
76
64
W
64
62

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Pichler
LLWWWLLL
L

Buvaysar Gadamauri

Bergamo ยท 1st Round Qualifying

16
26

Nov 16

L

Francesco Maestrelli

Bratislava 2 Challenger ยท 2nd Round

26
57

Oct 30

W

Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg

Bratislava 2 Challenger ยท 1st Round

64
64

Oct 28

W

Michal Krajci

Bratislava 2 ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

6277
63
75

Oct 27

W

Matej Dodig

Bratislava 2 ยท 1st Round Qualifying

7763
64

Oct 26

L

Javier Barranco Cosano

Braga ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
26

Sep 29

L

Michael Vrbensky

Szczecin ยท 1st Round Qualifying

26
26

Sep 7

L

Jakub Paul

Cassis ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

57
16

Sep 2

Wayenburg
LLWLLWLW
L

Guido Ivan Justo

Liberec Challenger ยท 1st Round

46
46

Jul 28

L

Igor Ribeiro Marcondes

Tampere Challenger ยท 2nd Round

765
627
26

Jul 23

W

Nicolai Budkov Kjaer

Tampere Challenger ยท 1st Round

764
63

Jul 21

L

Vadym Ursu

Bundesliga - men

36
75
510

Jul 12

L

Jerome Kym

Iasi Challenger ยท 2nd Round

617
57

Jul 8

W

Alexander Donski

Iasi Challenger ยท 1st Round

764
46
63

Jul 7

L

Maks Kasnikowski

Brasov Challenger ยท Quarterfinals

46
26

Jul 3

W

Lautaro Midon

Brasov Challenger ยท 2nd Round

46
63
64

Jul 1

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ Pichlerlevelโ†“ Wayenburg

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 9โ€“56 matches

MetricPichlerWayenburg
Matches won44%45%
Sets won42%46%
Games won45%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StagePichlerWayenburg
ATP Challenger Tour11

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfacePichlerWayenburg
Hard11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

David Pichler vs Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1โ€“1 over 2 meetings.